[ad_1]
Mr. A (right), a service soldier, who raised the suspicion that the son of Justice Minister Chu Mi-ae was returning to military leave, and Mr. Kim Young-soo, director of the Research Institute of National Defense Rights (formerly a former National Defense Rights Commissioner in charge of national defense) filed a complaint with the Eastern District Prosecutor’s Office in Songpa-gu, Seoul. I am intervening for it. News 1
On the 12th, a duty officer A, who denounced the suspicion of the son of Justice Minister Chu Mi-ae, who had preferential treatment for military leave, sued Choo on the 12th for defamation for false acts. It was after Minister Chu accused Mr. A of “a ‘neighbor’s uncle’ who belongs to a company other than his son” and was “misinterpreting and speculating with his neighbor’s uncle.” Unlike most, it has been confirmed to be true.
Soldier on duty, sued by Minister Chu and his lawyer son
Mr. A, along with Kim Young-soo, director of the Defense Rights Research Institute (former naval commander), visited the Seoul Eastern District Prosecutor’s Office at 2 pm and filed a complaint. Mr. A also sued attorney Hyun Geun-taek, who served as Mr. Seo’s defense. Prior to this, Mr. A requested an apology against Minister Chu, the current attorney, and Democratic Party Representative Hwang Hee, and sued the other two, in addition to Representative Hwang, who responded to the apology.
“If I apologize, I will withdraw the complaint.”
Mr. A said that day: “I came to present documents because I said I had to file the complaint in person,” and he said: “(I) just said it as it is.” Director Kim said, “If (Minister Chu) admits that Mr. A’s story is true and expresses an apology or regret, I will withdraw the complaint,” he said. “I believe that not only politicians, but the general public have honor and pride, so we have reached this point.”
Justice Minister Choo Mi-ae wears glasses at an audit of the state administration of the Ministry of Justice of the Legislative Judicial Council held at the National Assembly in Yeouido, Seoul on the 12th. Yunhap news
Mr. A said, “On June 25, 2017, after receiving a report that Mr. Seo had not returned, he called Mr. Seo to direct him to return, and then the captain of the Buddha statue came and ordered the exit “. In response, Minister Chu said in a questionnaire to the National Assembly on 17 last month: “The soldier on duty, known as the first informant, is a member of a different company than my son and is a member of a different company, the called ‘kadera’ “. . (The suspicion of his son’s preferential vacations) is the error and speculation of the neighbor’s uncle ”.
However, in the prosecution’s investigation, the content of Mr. A’s report turned out to be true, unlike Minister Chu’s rebuttal. As a result of the prosecution’s investigation, on the day Mr. A took office, Seo’s vacation was not processed. On paper, it means that Seo was the person who should have returned to the unit. It was also recognized that Captain Kim Mo, who was a support officer, visited Mr. A. In addition, Seo said in a prosecution investigation: “I received a call from the unit on June 25. I do not remember exactly if the soldier on guard was Mr. A. “On the 25th, the prosecution determined that Mr. A actually made the phone call based on the declaration of guard duty and the statements of other soldiers.
Entry statement “I did not call Mr. A” … Statement was different
Mr. Seo’s lawyers said, “On the 25th, when Mr. A claimed to be on duty, Mr. Seo’s vacation was already covered, so there was no need to speak to the soldier on duty.” In particular, Mr. A explained that the current attorney’s comments were corrupted by the current attorney’s comments and appeared on TBS’s ‘Kim Eo-jun’s News Factory’ while acting as Seo’s attorney.
Suspected by the Seoul Eastern District Prosecutor’s Office, until the day before
Mr. A was concerned about where to file the complaint until the day before. Director Kim said, “There is an opinion that the investigation by the Seoul Eastern District Prosecutor’s Office was unreliable, so we continue to consider whether to sue the police.” Still, while the Dongbu District Prosecutor’s Office investigated the suspicion of Mr. Seo’s return to vacation, it was possible to quickly investigate the defamation. We consider the jurisdiction of the minister’s house. “Mr. A added:” It is a sad situation that it is difficult for people to trust the investigative agency. “
Mr. A plans to sue those who have used insulting expressions about himself online, such as on social media, on defamation charges. Over 3,000 offensive posts and comments are reported to have been captured so far.
Reporter Jeong Jin-ho [email protected]
[ad_2]
