[ad_1]
 |
|
| ▲ Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeol’s Attorney Lee Wan-gyu Released Suspicion Of Illegal Judge | |
| Ⓒ Oh my news |
See related photos |
The reaction of the prosecution was even more surprising than the content of the document ‘Illegal Inspection of the Suspect Judge’ (), which the Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeol himself revealed. Immediately, I remembered the station.
What if it was known in the world that the Ministry of Justice carried out an investigation of prosecutors, even “ denounced ” them and managed them continuously and systematically, and that the minister ordered them? Wouldn’t the prosecution immediately stand up saying it was “illegal”?
Also, what if the subject of the creation of the document was a military security guard, a military prosecutor or the National Intelligence Service, and the people involved in the inspection were the people? Could it have been possible to defend the head of the organization even within the army or within the NIS? If it weren’t for the accusation, the media would say ‘Gamran’ or ‘Yun Seok-yeol vs. Was it possible to push Chu Mi-ae’s frame? What about the opposition conservative party taking a swift offensive “Why is President Moon Jae-in silent?”
From the meeting of the prosecutors to the Attorney General’s Office, among the public officials who receive their salaries from the people’s taxes, only the prosecution will be able to make such an open protest. These are all evidences of who is benefiting from the current ‘Prosecutor Yoon Seok-yeol’ and why the prosecution organization, which supports itself as a sanctuary group and flaunts power, should be reformed.
Among the six disciplinary grounds of the Ministry of Justice, there is no analysis that only “illegal inspection” is a problem, but other cases are “over.” There is also an opinion that Yoon published only a small part of the large number of related documents that do not seem to be a problem for the multimedia game. Looking at it, the analysis appeared that the entire result of the prosecution inspection by President Yoon did not comply with the code of ethics or that only the ‘inspection interference’ was an analysis. What is clear is the fact that from the perspective of “common sense” people, prosecution practice is not something to consider.
The previous judges and incumbents, who are the parties to the document containing inappropriate content containing personal information under the name ‘Epyeong’, have already weighed in on the station. One of the Jeju District Law Representative Judges, who said, “Is the judge stupid?”, Requested censorship and prosecution of the person in charge, and an investigation into the airlift in the future.
However, practicing prosecutors who have engaged in the mass rebellion are closing their eyes on the legality of the “judge’s inspection” document or defending President Yun’s position that it was a practice, that is, “the scope of routine investigation for the maintenance of public property “. Do they perceive themselves as beings above the law and democratic control? At the time of the judicial Nongdan, the prosecution was not enough to prosecute those who ordered or created a “black list of judges.”
The difference between police collection and the prosecution
 |
|
| ▲ People’s Power Seong-won Kim (center), Congressman Joo-hye Jeon (left), and spokesman Bae Hyun-jin from the ophthalmology department of the National Assembly on the morning of the 27th. A total of 110 legislators, including 103 people, 3 popular parties and 4 independent parties, participated in the investigation request. | |
| Ⓒ Joint coverage photo |
See related photos |
“Collecting opinions other than those authorized by the authority is an illegal instruction without legal basis.”
It is clear. It is not a legal interpretation of the prosecution’s “judge’s inspection” document. In January, the Liberal Party of Korea, predecessor of people’s power, at the request of the Blue House Office of Civil Affairs, collected the opinions of 100 prosecutors promoted by the police. These are some of the comments that were made when accusing the Great Sword.
At the time, the Korean Party accused the three people of interfering in the exercise of the right to abuse rights and violating the Personal Information Protection Act, saying: “Data collection and evaluation reports on the targets of the prosecutor’s promotion are not within the scope of the information police’s job assignment. ” Two days after it was received, the case was assigned to the third anti-corruption investigation department and the investigation began immediately.
The police explained that it was normal business according to due process. It was explained that it was a normal procedure with the consent of the prosecutors who were promoted. However, the atmosphere at that time was quite different. The logic was that the police’s compilation of opinions was itself inappropriate and that the police could not be trusted.
 |
|
| ▲ Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeol is moving inside the training center to give a lecture to the new deputy prosecutor at the Jincheon Legal Training Institute on the afternoon of the 9th. | |
| Ⓒ Yonhap News |
See related photos |
“Prosecutors say that when former prosecutors Kwon Jae-jin and Hwang Gyo-an and Chu Mi-ae were the Justice Minister, they say that the democratic legitimacy of our tax organization comes from the command and supervision of the Justice Minister. I did it.
At that time we talked about it, but now nobody talks about it. General Yoon said that I am not a subordinate. It’s just that the prosecutor’s republic itself, which is related to senior and junior prosecutors, is chosen as their ideal republic. “
-Attorney Lee Yeon-joo, a former prosecutor who appeared in the attention of mbc radio on the 27th
As attorney Lee Yeon-ju Jung-guk said, the resignation of former Attorney General Chae Dong-wook in September 2013 during his tenure as former Justice Minister Hwang Gyo-an is also a good example of what the prosecution should do. . Among front-line prosecutors at the time, a small number of prosecutors, including the Western District Prosecutors Meeting, openly opposed the Justice Ministry’s oversight of Hwang Gyo-an against Chae. These are the prosecutors who expressed their beliefs with their real names in front of the ‘Hwang Gyo-an-Kwak Sang-do’ line. It is in contrast to now.
There is no reason for only one investigative agency, the prosecution, to reign as an extrajudicial entity. In the past, the National Intelligence Service, the military security guards and the police that contributed to the stigma of the “Republic of Inspection” are under democratic control.
