[ad_1]
 |
| On the afternoon of the 24th, former Justice Minister Cho Kook announced through his Facebook that the second reason for the exclusion of Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeol from the duties was ‘Illegal Inspection of the Homeland Trial’. Shortly after, former Minister Cho added an explanation of related contents from Minister Chu. (Capture from Facebook) © News1 |
Former Justice Minister Cho Kook announced on the afternoon of the 24th what Yoon had done wrong in his own way regarding the exclusion of Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeol.
On that day, Justice Minister Chu Mi-ae announced that Yoon had decided to seek disciplinary action and exclusion from work, citing five reasons, including “inappropriate contact with the media owner.” This is the first time in the history of the constitution that the current attorney general has been excluded from his duties.
Former Minister Cho, who had been in a strong confrontation with President Yoon just before the nomination of the candidate for Minister of Justice, delivered the announcement of Minister Choo Mi’s “ 5 Reasons for the Impossibility of Yoon Seok-yeol ” -ae on its Facebook page and introduced specially related content.
Former Minister Cho only captured the broadcast screen around 6:42 p.m. that day and posted it on his Facebook page.
On the screen, along with Minister Chu’s announcement, there was a red caption titled “Illegal Inspection of the Judiciary in Important Cases such as the Case of the Second Former Minister of Korea,” which is the second reason why President Yoon did not may.
Five minutes later, former Minister Cho melted into the section where Minister Chu explained the details.
Minister Chu said: “In February 2020, the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office of the Office of Investigation Policy and Information of the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office related to the Ulsan case and the case related to former Minister Cho Kook, related to the judge of the judiciary , ‘the content of judgments in major political cases, whether to join the Korean Law Research Association, family relations, tax, personal hobbies. Inform and inform the Ministry of Anti-Corruption and Armed Forces, such as the collection and the use of personal information and propensity data of judges that cannot be collected by the Office of Information Policy Office, He said.
Meanwhile, Cho has argued that powers vested in the prosecution, such as President Yoon Seok-yeol, carried out an investigation by force and even a false prosecution to unite him and his family in order to prevent “reform of the prosecution”.
Former Minister Cho went one step further, noting that the prosecution even conducted illegal inspections to put pressure on the courts, emphasizing that the investigation and prosecution related to him were a total fault.
[ad_2]
