[ad_1]
The Tong Yang University aide, who testified in the trial of Professor Chung Kyung-shim of Tong Yang University, who is being tried on charges of irregularities in the entrance examination, said: “I saw the file of the President’s stamp on a work computer, “and then changed his words to the prosecution’s question.
On the 8th, Lee Mo, who worked as an assistant at Tong Yang University, was present at Professor Jeong’s trial that took place at the hearing of the Criminal Division 25-2 of the Seoul Central District Court (Judge Lim Jeong-yeop). When Professor Chung’s lawyer asked, “Have you ever seen the image file of the president’s work on the PC of the College of Liberal Arts used by the witness?”, Lee replied, “Yes.”
He said, “It looks like I was rummaging through the computer because I had nothing to do, but I saw several image files that turned up at that time. She said, “There were so many files that I had to download the scroll” and “there were about two stamps.”
Professor Jeong said, “The files were backed up without knowing the president’s stamp files found on a work computer brought in from Tong Yang University. It must have been done by the assistant teachers. ”The content of the teaching assistant’s testimony is consistent with Professor Chung’s argument.
However, Mr. Lee changed the statement to the prosecution’s counter-report, saying: “It is not clear if it is the seal of the president.” When the prosecution asked, “What is the stamp file the witness saw like?” Lee said, “One appears to have been a bad structure and the other was the president’s stamp.” However, when the prosecution showed the seal of the president of Tong Yang University, Mr. Lee said, “It is not correct,” and did not know whether it was the seal of the president.
Mr. Lee also said that he presented the Tong Yang University president’s certificate himself, and that he entered the certificate number randomly and did not record everything in the stamp register. This is consistent with the professor’s claim that the presidential office was not properly managed. However, the situation changed again when the prosecution presented as evidence the official letter sent by Mr. Lee to the university. In the official letter, the certificate numbers were written in order of 1, 2, 3, but the student actually received the certificate that started with the number 569. This is the number given by the general affairs department of the university and Contrary to Lee’s claim, the university administered the certificate. When the prosecution asked, “How did you enter the number 569?” Lee said, “I don’t remember.”
Then, this time, the judge came out. Chief Judge Lim Jeong-yeop said, “Witness, I swore earlier. The one I wrote was number 001, but I have to explain why it makes a difference. “When Mr. Lee said,” I don’t remember, “the judge asked again,” Didn’t you say you didn’t get a number when the list came out? ? “In the end, Mr. Lee said,” Okay, why did this come out? “
