[ad_1]
In the passport, it is constantly mentioned as an object of investigation.
“Political events are a burden from the start”
Members of the People’s Power, who oppose some amendments to the Law on Establishment and Operation of Crime Investigation Centers of High-Level Public Officials, protest at the National Assembly in Yeouido, Seoul, on the 8th, holding placards with slogans against air travel. Yunhap news
When the amendment to the Law of the Office of Investigation of Crimes of High-ranking Public Officials (Air Bridge) was finally approved at an extraordinary meeting of the National Assembly on the 10th, the construction of the air bridge, which had been at the drift so far, started in earnest. Although attention is being paid to who will become the first chief of the airlift, the interest of the super-American is also the first topic of investigation by the airlift. Since the ruling party can virtually eliminate the opposition party and appoint the chief of the airlift, the political controversy can be amplified or diminished depending on the case in which the airlift draws the sword first. Furthermore, it can be a barometer to assess whether it will play a role consistent with the original purpose of the “prosecution reform.”
In criminal passport and legal circles, remarks have been continually raised that various suspicions surrounding Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeol and his family and close associates will be ‘Public Prison Case 1’. Representative Choi Kang-wook of the Open Democratic Party, which was founded claiming to be the “ Political Party that protects former Justice Minister Cho Kuk, ” has pointed to President Yoon and his wife (Kim Kun-hee) as the targets of the aerial investigation since the April general elections. After the prosecution’s investigation into Cho last year, it has nothing to do with the reality that Yoon is being pushed by the current government and passports as a ‘public enemy’.
In fact, this trend is increasingly evident for the Justice Minister Chu Mi-ae, who took office in January this year. In order to protect the prosecutor Han Dong-hoon, who became embroiled in the so-called ‘indictment trial’, Yoon ordered the convening of a professional investigation advisory team to convene a ‘cover my family’ controversy. ‘, and in June he gave Minister Chu the excuse to invoke the authority to command the investigation. From this point on, the conflict between Minister Chu and President Yoon spiraled out of control and eventually the unprecedented ‘supervision of incumbent attorney general’ Jungkook began. On the 24th of last month, Minister Chu requested severe disciplinary action against President Yoon for six reasons, including interference with the prosecutor’s office on the 24th of last month, △ Illegal contact with the media owner, △ Illegal inspection of the Court Justice △ Investigation and interference in the case of former Prime Minister Han Myung-sook. I ordered the exclusion. In particular, he asked the prosecution to investigate the allegations of “Illegal inspection of the Court of Justice”.
Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeol, who was not present at the disciplinary committee of the Ministry of Justice, is getting into a vehicle at the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office in Seocho-gu, Seoul. Newsis
The case of corruption in the type of power, in which the presumed participation of President Yoon was raised, is also mentioned as the target of the investigation by the air defense agency. It is also supported by the fact that the previous day, Minister Chu published a criticism of the results of the investigation on the suspicion of “ receiving entertainment from prosecutors related to the management of assets of lime ” on the Network Service Social (SNS) the day before, implying the possibility of Yoon’s participation and clarifying “ promotion of the prosecution reform. ” . Also, the suspicion of the “ Optimus Asset Management Political Lobby ” with the names of passport politicians going up and down (Seoul Central District Prosecutor’s Office), and the “ Manipulation of the Economic Evaluation of the Plant of Wolseong Nuclear Power No. 1 ” addressed to the Blue House (Daejeon Prosecutor’s Office) will be transferred to the airlift. Some predict that the possibility cannot be ruled out.
However, it is difficult to see that the air defense agency will not address events that will bring political controversy again as soon as it takes its first steps. As it is launched under the name of ‘guarantees of political neutrality of the institutions of power’, it is said that it will choose an event that cannot be covered by criticism of ‘research that adapts to the taste of power’. A prosecutor from the local prosecutor’s office said: “If the airborne agency chooses the subject of the investigation claimed by the current government or the passport, it could transform into another agency of power that used the guilt to reform the prosecution and would become ineffective.” . A lawyer who was a deputy prosecutor said: “In the case of the first case chosen by the air defense agency, the symbolism is very great because it shows the character and the direction of the institution in the future.”
Aram ahn reporter [email protected]
Subscribe to the Hankook Ilbo News Naver channel
Balance to see the world, the Hankook Ilbo Copyright © Hankookilbo
[ad_2]
