“Agree sexually with stepdaughter?” Appeal dismissed from stepfather who had been sexually assaulted for 11 years and even got pregnant

[아시아경제 최은영 기자] The appeal of the stepfather and the mother, who raped for 11 years, was rejected by attacking and intimidating the minor stepdaughter.

On the 2nd, the First Criminal Division of the Changwon Court of the Busan High Court (Judge Jin-seok Kim) appealed to Mr. Park (52), who was sentenced to 25 years in prison in the lower court on 11 charges that they include special quasi-rape, kinship-based rape, and rape of adults under 13 years of age. Has been fired.

Along with this, he kept 12 years in prison for his mother, Kang, 53, who aided Park in the crimes.

In June 2006, at his home in Gimhae, Gyeongsangnam-do, Park sexually abused his stepdaughter, who was 9 years old, saying, “Dad can touch his daughter’s body.”

Later, in 2007, he raped his stepdaughter while her mother watched. Park continued with the crime, saying, “Because you have a strong sexual desire, you have to release your sexual desire with your father.” In 2009, he raped his 13-year-old stepdaughter with her mother.

During the trial, the stepdaughter said: “Only then could I go out and receive pocket money,” she said. “To my friends, I rather bragged that my dad bought me something delicious and gave me pocket money.

The sexual assault continued even after her stepdaughter became a college student in 2015, and in 2016, she even underwent abortion surgery. Later, with the help of acquaintances around him, he visited an investigative agency.

Park protested at the trial, saying, “I only had sex under agreement,” but the court did not accept the parents’ arguments.

The first court ruled: “Despite the duty and responsibility to protect and raise a stepdaughter so that her stepdaughter can properly grow up as a protector, she abandoned this duty and committed a crime against humanity.”

Stepfather Park and mother Kang said: “There is no fact that the victim has committed sexual acts such as harassment or adultery using the victim’s psychological inability to protest. However, the victim has only had consensual sex from 6 to 7 times since adulthood And he appealed.

In response, the Court of Appeals said: “The crime is very serious in light of the content, method and duration of the crime of harassment, rape or similar violation using the psychological incapacity of the victim to protest. He said, “I went through extreme pain in my life when I was denied.”

Internal reporter Choi Eun-young [email protected]