[ad_1]
 |
| Seoul Central District Court, Seocho-gu, Seoul © News1 |
A woman in her 90s, who was convicted of watching a North Korean propaganda broadcast and saying “Kim Il-sung is handsome,” was found not guilty after about 40 years.
According to law enforcement officials on the 12th, the second party of the Seoul Central District Court Criminal Affairs Bureau (Presiding Judge Lee Kwan-yong) was acquitted in a retrial against Mr. A ( 95), accused of violating the anti-communist law.
Mr A investigated that he saw the ‘row house where Kim Il-sung lived’, ‘the circus projected at the Pyongyang National Theater’ and ‘the North Korean army procession’ for about an hour at the home of a known located in Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do around 7:40 pm on June 3, 1978. done.
The next day at 10 am, Mr. A told his acquaintance, Mr. B, “I thought Kim Il-sung was older, but he was fat and young, so he looked to be 40 years old, but he was Handsome”. He is accused of saying “There was”.
At 9 o’clock on the same night, Mr. A tells his sister-in-law’s husband, C, to see if the North Korean broadcasts appear on their home television.
In September of the same year, Mr. A was convicted of violating anti-communist law, and in March of the following year, he was sentenced to 10 months in prison and 1 year of suspension.
Subsequently, Mr. A applied to the court for a new trial in May, and the court decided to initiate a new trial, saying that although the police involved in the investigation of the case proved to have committed a work-related crime, it was admitted that it was recognized a disability that could not be condemned.
In the course of the trial, Mr. A argued: “I did not commit a crime as a prosecution.”
The prosecution also said: “The brother of the centrifuge is too light and unfair.”
The judge said: “The centrifugal court convicted the prosecution based on the statements of Mr. A and the witnesses,” and said: “The evidence of centrifugation alone endangers the existence and security of the state due to the actions of Mr. A, or to the basic free democratic order. It is difficult to say that there has been a serious or obvious risk. “
“It is a great spring that Mr. A was detained without being issued a post-emergency arrest warrant within 48 hours of being arrested by police officers, and that he was illegally detained even after that the arrest warrant was issued. ” In light of this, there are circumstances in which Mr. A doubts the randomness of the statement made by the investigating agency. “
“In light of the fact that Mr. A was tried while in custody, there is a high possibility that Mr. A’s judicial statement was also made without resolving the state of randomness. Regarding the witnesses present in the court, Mr. A is usually North Korea He added: “I did not say anything about it, and only said that I saw a North Korean broadcast by accident after going to see a soap opera with my acquaintance.
[ad_2]
