[ad_1]
After Cho Guk-shim’s wife, Dongyang University professor Chung Gyeong-shim, was sentenced to prison, criticism of the judiciary is heating up. While the passport insisted on “judicial reform”, supporters of the regime revealed the identity of the relevant judges and tried to “accuse the judges.” The legal community is concerned, saying: “It is a direct denial of the principle of separation of powers under the constitution.”
I am guilty of “judicial reform” … Judge of personal attack
On the 24th, members of the Democratic Party referred to Professor Jeong’s decision and insisted on judicial reform. Chief Commissioner Kim Jong-min said on MBC Radio that day: “The conviction was convicted due to the circumstances of suspicion, and the judicial review of the accusation was not carried out properly.” He insisted.
Supreme Commissioner Shin Dong-geun quoted a media interview with former Judge Lee Tan-hee, who said: “I was unable to reform the judicial process because I was concentrating on the reform of the prosecution,” he wrote, “I realize that today is very difficult. ” Representative Yoon Young-chan said, “Was Professor Jeong’s cross erased on behalf of many parents who risked their lives in the specification?”, And Representative Kim Jin-ae of the Open Democratic Party said on Facebook: “There were many Concerns about judge Lim Jeong-yeop’s bias in court. Not only prosecution reform, but also judicial and media reform are urgent. ”
The previous day, on the notice board of the Blue House National Petition, an article was published requesting the impeachment of Judges Lim Jung-yeop, Kwon Seong-su and Kim Sun-hee, belonging to 25-2 of the Agreement Seoul Central District Criminal Court. This article, in which some 140,000 people agreed, he heard “because three judges seriously violate article 103 of the Constitution, which requires judgment of conscience.”
Personal attacks against individuals in the judiciary also exceed the grade. Online communities have posted derogatory articles referring to the probation or innocence of Judge Lim Jeong-yeop, the judge. Comments such as ‘Badge (judge + trash)’ and ‘The Airborne Division investigation issue’ were also posted.
“If you don’t like it, take out a judge, what fair do you want?”
In the legal world, it is called an “irrational shake of the judiciary.”
A lawyer who used to be a judge criticized that “if a politician he supports is prosecuted, the prosecution will be blamed, and if he is found guilty, the court will blame him.” A deputy prosecutor for the metropolitan area said: “It is a terrible cognitive dissonance” and “It is different from the reality that I believed, so let’s change the rules.”
Another prosecutor said: “I don’t know if the political power that only believes in certain supporters and is shaking the country is the leader and the ruling power of the country.” He added: “There was a phrase in the trial,” The pain of those who told the truth, “he said,” I am suffering because literally the judge told the truth. ”
Kim Han-gyu, former president of the Seoul Bar Association, said: “The representative of the people, who is a legislative body, is talking about impeachment of judges and judicial reform because they do not like the ruling.” I’ll do it for you. ”
One sitting judge said: “As a judge, you must accept a legitimate criticism of the ruling, but it is becoming common practice to personally attack the judge and threaten his position.” “Do you really want the judge to make a fair trial based on the law and conscience? I don’t know if I just want to give a ruling in favor of the regime ”.
Reporter Dr. Ra and Kim Soo-min [email protected]
[ad_2]