[ad_1]
Mi-ae Chu, Seok-yeol Yoon demands disciplinary action and orders removal from duty … First in dedication
Jo Eung-cheon “Chu Mi-ae, crossing the bridge who cannot return”
Park Yong-jin “If Chu Mi-ae’s announcement regarding Yoon Seok-yeol is true, discipline is inevitable”
Justice Minister Choo Mi-ae held an emergency briefing at the Seoul Senior Prosecutor’s Office on the 24th on the results of Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeol’s inspection, and announced the policy of disciplinary claims and exclusion duty against General Yoon. The photo shows Minister Chu (right) attending the State Council meeting on the morning of the day and President Yoon attending work. [이미지출처=연합뉴스]
In an article posted on his Facebook page on the 25th, Cho Eung-cheon, a member of the Democratic Party of Korea, said: “Indeed, it is a matter of exclusion and disciplinary demand for the attorney general, who is the first in history of constitutional affairs “. “No,” he criticized Chu’s action.
He said: “Regarding President Yoon, Minister Chu exercised his first investigative command, supervisory authority, and personnel rights, along with very harsh language right after his inauguration. Then he finally crossed the bridge of exclusion and the disciplinary demands “Is everything consistent with the reform of the prosecution?”
He repeatedly criticized: “What is prosecution reform? Is the definition of criminal justice correct when the public prisons agency (high-level public officials criminal investigation agency) is launched and Yoon Seok-yeol is excluded? “
In addition, Congressman Cho said: “Citizens are looking forward to the news that the number of confirmed coronaviruses has decreased rapidly and the game has improved, rather than the news beginning with the prosecution reform, Chu Mi-ae and Yoon Seok-yeol, “he said. I don’t think I said, ‘In words, people are crying and their eyes are on the accusation.’ I hope we can become a governing force that makes people feel more comfortable. “
Former lawmaker Geum Tae-seop, who had left the Democratic Party, also raised a critical voice, saying that Minister Chu’s action against Yoon the day before was “shocked.”
He said through his Facebook page: “If you have common sense, you can see what is the reason for the true disciplinary claim. In the investigation of the important cases, you acted differently than the will of the government.” In this way, he laughed for nothing. What’s different about the Park Geun-hye administration that made Attorney General Chae Dong-wook resign for the wrong reason that he didn’t like the investigation of the comment? “
“Many of the reasons for the disciplinary action the passport claims, including the mother-in-law issue, occurred before the appointment of the attorney general. At that time, the Blue House and the Democratic Party praised prosecutor Yoon Seok-yeol.” I changed my attitude 180 degrees to attack, but how can I not ponder a word? “
Democratic Party lawmaker Park Yong-jin is investigating the general audit of the Financial Services Commission and the Financial Oversight Service of the Political Affairs Committee held in the National Assembly on 23 last month. [이미지출처=연합뉴스]
On the other hand, Democratic Party lawmaker Park Yong-jin said: “If the content announced by the Minister of Justice is true, disciplinary action is inevitable.”
He appeared on CBS radio’s ‘Kim Hyun-jung’s News Show’ and said, “There seems to be no speculation yet that the content of what the Justice Minister directly announced will be unfounded.
Representative Park said, “Kim Tae-nyeon also said that he did not know the situation well last night,” and said, “None of the ruling party legislators are aware of the situation.”
Former Democratic Party legislator Kim Hae-young did not comment on Minister Chu’s actions. but, He addressed the party’s highest committee member in February,I urge you to be cautious with every statement so as not to misunderstand people. “ I asked.
The day before, Minister Chu discarded Yun’s duties and demanded disciplinary action. This is the first time in the history of the constitution that a practicing attorney general has been ordered to suspend his functions.
During a briefing in the press room on the first floor of the Seoul Senior Prosecutor’s Office on the same day, Minister Chu said, “We confirmed many serious and serious misconduct charges by the Attorney General.” “We decided that it could no longer be tolerated, so today we are demanding disciplinary action against the attorney general and ordering the attorney general to suspend his duties.”
The main charges of Yoon’s misconduct, alleged by Minister Chu, are ▲ Inappropriate contact with the media owner ▲ Illegal inspection by the judiciary in important cases such as the case of former Minister Cho Kook ▲ Investigation of information related to inspection with the media ▲ Violation of the duty of cooperation and inspection in the process of a face-to-face investigation Obstruction ▲ Damage to the dignity and confidence of the attorney general regarding political neutrality.
Reporter Mi-dam Heo [email protected]
