94% of legal reporters “Problem invoking Chu Miae’s investigation and command right”



[ad_1]

A poll found that 94% of progressive law reporters answered that the initiation of the investigation and the command of the Minister of Justice, Chu Mi-ae, was negative. The survey was conducted with 99 reporters from 30 media companies out of 207 reporters from 32 media companies entering the Supreme Court.

The Legal Journalists Club, a corporate judicial body, announced the results of a survey of headline legal journalists on the 17th, receiving advice from Pollap of Seoul National University. % Of negative responses.

Specifically, 93.9% of the respondents who identified as progressive (33.7%) viewed them as negative, and all respondents who declared themselves conservative (22.4%) answered that they were negative. According to reporters (43.9%), who said they were moderate, 90.7% said they were negative.

Minister Chu invoked the authority of investigation and command in the case of former Prime Minister Han Myung-sook, the alleged incident of the testamentary convergence of Channel A and the Lime case, and prosecutors rebelled saying it was a measure to shake the political neutrality.

▲ Minister of Justice Chu Miae.  Photo = Voice of the people
▲ Minister of Justice Chu Mi-ae. Photo = Voice of the people

Legal reporters also said that 83.8% of those surveyed were negative even before the prosecution of Minister Chu. Progressive reporters said 90.9% and conservative reporters were all negative.

In relation to the alleged incident of the channel A prosecution, he criticized both the reporter’s reporting method and the prosecution’s investigation. Former Channel A reporter Lee Dong-jae sent a letter to former VIK representative Lee Chul to cover accusations of misrepresentation in passport staff, but the prosecution went to trial saying the former reporter threatened Lee Chul.

When asked, ‘How do you rate the reporter’s coverage of the Channel A incident?’ 84.8% of those surveyed said it was negative. Only 6.1% of the reporters responded positively. In response to the question, ‘How do you evaluate the investigation of the Prosecutor’s Office on the accusation of the alleged prosecutor?’, 82.8% of those surveyed answered that it was negative.

Respondents said that 61.6% of respondents said they were negative about the establishment of a criminal investigation center for high-ranking public officials (airborne). Respondents with a tendency to progress had the same response as normal (36.4%) and somewhat negative (36.4%), but 48.5% answered positive (somewhat positive + very positive), exceeding 15.1% . did. Conservative respondents said they were all negative.

In addition, journalists who entered the legal law saw the prohibition of reporting criminal cases as negative 81.8% (very negative 47.5%, somewhat negative 34.3%). 30.3% of those surveyed answered that they were positive about the reform measures adopted after the inauguration of the Chief Justice, Kim Myung-soo (23.2%). Opinions on the investigation of the prosecution on the right to abuse of the judicial administration were both positive and negative (positive 30.3%, negative 33.3%).

▲ What legal reporters want from the courts and the prosecution Source = Club de Periodistas Legales
▲ What legal reporters want for the court and the prosecution. Source = Club of Legal Journalists

On the other hand, law enforcement journalists asked prosecutors and courts to further “ reveal ” accusations, sentences and criminal cases when asked if they had any suggestions.

Copyright © Media Today, unauthorized reproduction and redistribution are prohibited.




[ad_2]