[ad_1]
Jeong Jin-woong (right), who was investigating the so-called ‘probate confusion’, the first head of the Seoul Central District Prosecutor’s Office on July 29 this year, was charged with assaulting himself in the seizure process and search for prosecutor Han Dong-hoon’s mobile phone. Yonhap News Material Photo
Regarding the Deputy Prosecutor of the Gwangju District Prosecutor’s Office, Jeong Jin-woong (52, 29th Judicial Research and Training Institute), who led the investigation of the so-called ‘probate confusion’, said on the 16th: “Do you think that is it correct that the deputy prosecutor of the accused state is in command of the junior prosecutors? ” Han Dong-soo (53 · 24) criticized the head of the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office. Despite recent charges of self-directed assault, Deputy Attorney General Chung was indicted, but one of the prosecutors fired direct shots for publicly stating that “a request for exclusion from duties for Prosecutor Chung is inappropriate.”
Jung Yoo-mi (48/30), Incheon District Prosecutor’s Office, Bucheon District Office Human Rights Inspector (department prosecutor level) posted a post titled ‘To the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office’ on Eprus, the computer network internal prosecutor’s office, and convicted one of the prosecutors and Deputy Prosecutor Chung. . In this article, Human Rights Superintendent Chung said: “The Supreme Prosecutor’s Office of the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office disclosed the opinion coordination process within the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office to the Social Network Service (SNS). I was surprised by the audacity of the dissemination method and couldn’t help being surprised by the audacity of the content. “
Earlier, on his Facebook page the day before, a supervising prosecutor insisted on his Facebook request for exclusion from the functions of the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office, saying: “It was considered an inappropriate measure that did not comply with the requirements of the Disciplinary Law. of the Office of the Prosecutor, for which I presented an objection but it was not accepted. ” Deputy Prosecutor Chung was found to have used physical force unfairly while executing a warrant for the seizure and search of a mobile phone simulator by Han Dong-hun (47/27), one of the suspects in the alleged case confusion of the prosecution. He was indicted on charges. In this regard, the head of the prosecution said: “In consideration of the fact that the prosecution is the closest to Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeol and the fact that the ‘prosecution’ is an important issue on which authority is invoked from the Minister of Justice to lead the investigation, the deputy chief prosecutor at the meeting of the deputy attorney general It was suggested to discuss the request for suspension of the work execution, but it was not accepted.
Regarding this, human rights inspector Jung said: “Do you think the situation is correct when the deputy state prosecutor for the accused is in command of the junior prosecutors?” And he asked, “Isn’t it like a court proceeding with a trial even if a judge is prosecuted and becomes a defendant?” . A former judge, former prosecutor, was appointed as the chief prosecutor’s office in October last year through an external competition.
Human rights inspector Jung said: “If you think it is correct to place the defendant’s deputy prosecutor in the position of commander of junior prosecutors, have you ever considered the posts of junior prosecutors and employees who have to work accordingly? with the command? Also asked. He also said, “No way, since the prosecution is an enemy anyway, I don’t want you to think you don’t have to do that.”
Then, he aimed his arrow at Prosecutor Chung and continued his criticism. Human rights inspector Jung said: “If a practicing prosecutor is not just a suspect, but is prosecuted and becomes a defendant, then of course it is appropriate to be excluded from work.” Furthermore, he said, “Even if the command department does not remove the position, it is a good idea to ask them to withdraw from a position that does not pay their own approval.” He even added: “I am not sure if there is a precedent for the incumbent prosecutor who was not excluded from the post.” .
Human Rights Superintendent Jung reported on the controversial assault case by Deputy Prosecutor Jung, which sparked the controversy of the ‘prosecutor’s armistice’. To the people) “Why is it our shame?” He noted, “I’m really embarrassed by the kind of face (Deputy Prosecutor Jeong) has to guide his youth and make payments, rendering him innocent.”
Choi Na-sil reporter [email protected]
Subscribe to the Hankook Ilbo News Naver channel
Balance to see the world, the Hankook Ilbo Copyright © Hankookilbo
[ad_2]
