[ad_1]
Justice Minister Choo Mi-ae attends the Candidate Recommendation Committee for the Chief of the High-Ranking Officers Criminal Investigation Bureau (Airport Bureau) held at the National Assembly in Yeouido, Seoul on the day 13, and greets members Lim Jeong-hyuk (from right), Lee Heon and Lee Chan-hee. 2020.11.13 / News1 © News1 While the Candidate Recommendation Committee, head of the Senior Officials Criminal Investigation Office (KPA), is scheduled to attempt to compress the candidates again on the 18th, the Democratic Party is open to the possibility of amending the Air Convict Act. to neutralize the derogatory rights of the opposition party. The Democratic Party’s plan is that the candidates should be compressed in two at the meeting on the 18th and the staff hearing should be completed within this month.
According to the Democratic Party on the 15th, members of the Democratic Party’s judicial committee will first hold a so-called judicial committee on the 16th and 17th and will discuss key bills such as amendments to the trade law. On the 18th, the revision of the amendment to the Air Transport Law was decided on the basis of the results of the meeting of the Candidate Recommendation Committee.
The deadline caught by Democrats is the 18th. Policy is to make a final decision on whether or not to review the amendment to the Air Transportation Act at the 3rd meeting of the Candidate Recommendation Committee held at 2 pm on the 18th .
The amendment to the Air Transport Law, initiated by Representative Kim Yong-min of the Judicial Committee, is currently being referred to the subcommittee for legal review. The amendment contains the content of neutralizing the opposition party’s deterrence by allowing the Speaker of the National Assembly to recommend a candidate for nominated member if the parliamentary bargaining organization does not recommend a candidate for nominated member. In addition, a revised bill initiated by Representative Paik Hye-ryeon and others with similar content is also being referred to the judiciary. In a phone call with News 1, a member of the Democratic Party judiciary said: “There is a third meeting on the 18th to recommend candidates for the Minister of Public Affairs, so I will wait until then.” “I see the 18th as the last meeting. I emphasized. He said: “On the 16th and 17th we will open the so-called commercial law and other bills, and we will continue to open the so-called societies after that.”
On the 18th, the Democratic Party acknowledged the intention of the opposition party, as if it was due to a deliberate delay strategy or if it took a long time to verify the candidate’s qualifications for reasonable reasons, and then decided on the advancement of the discussion on the revision of the law. It is policy to decide.
The Democratic Party has not raised doubts within the opposition.
In an article posted on Facebook the day before, Democratic Party chief spokesman Choi In-ho said: “I doubt that the real reason for the postponement of the candidate’s recommendation is the intentional delay tactic of some nominees.” When it is judged that it is an “air defense strategy” during the process, we are reminded that we have no choice but to follow the alternative path. ”
On the other hand, in the power of the people, through a comment by the spokesman Kim Ye-ryeong, he expressed his discontent because “the Democratic Party is ignoring the air transport laws they have made and revising them again and threatening the opposition party.” .
Lawyer Seok Dong-hyeon, a candidate for the head of the airlift recommended by the People’s Power, said on Facebook the same day: “The people of the ruling party who are actively involved in the establishment of the airlift are the people of the ruling party, and the opposition party that should enjoy the situation is passive. “It is not ironic,” he expressed doubts about the ruling party’s rush to install the airlift.
Meanwhile, the Candidate Recommendation Committee will hold a third meeting at 2pm on the 18th and enter into discussions to determine the final 2 candidates out of 10.
At the second meeting on the 13th, an agreement was attempted to select two finalists, but none of the 10 candidates who were evaluated were excluded. It is said that the conclusion was not reached due to the clash between the prudential and the quick theory among the recommending members. Justice Minister Chu Mi-ae even mentioned the “ final discussion, ” but ended with rescheduling the meeting.
(Seoul = News 1)
Copyright by dongA.com All rights reserved.
