[ad_1]
Kim Yoon-woo MBC’s lawyer appeared ‘Kim Jong-bae’s attention’
“In case of corruption, the evidence disappears after time”
The answer was that it was difficult to understand the reasons why the court dismissed the court order on the dismissal of all seizure and search warrants for the ‘suspicion of unfair patronage’ of Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeol’s wife, Kim Gun. -hee (48).
Kim Yoon-woo, a former judge, appeared on MBC radio ‘The Attention of Kim Jong-bae’ on the 12th and said, “In the case of corruption cases, the evidence may disappear after that time,” he said, “It is unexpected.”
Attorney Kim said: “Some of the layoffs are common in a way that restricts the subject, place and method in a seizure and search warrant. It is very easy to predict that the need for a seizure and search will go away without seizure. It’s easy to admit. He said, “I tend to discard some of them with the intention of limiting the target rather than discarding them all,” he said.
“Some fire a lot, but all fire …”
Yoon’s wife, Kim, is under suspicion that he has actually been invited to an exhibition organized by a company that he runs. Cobana Contents, directed by Kim, held a screening in June last year, when Yoon was nominated as a candidate for the impeachment. Some of the sponsors at the time were being investigated and tried by the prosecution, raising suspicions that they were actually solicited.
Upon receiving the indictment, the prosecution assigned the case to the Second Anti-Corruption Investigation Division of the Seoul Central District Prosecutor’s Office (Director Jung Yong-hwan) and requested a seizure and search warrant for the Cobana Contents Office. However, it is known that the court dismissed the claim on the 9th alleging that “there is the possibility of voluntary presentation of key evidence, and the violation of legal interests in the execution of the order is serious.” On the 11th, the prosecution is analyzing the company’s tax data, handing it over to the tax authorities.
Regarding this, attorney Kim posed a question: “In the case of fraud, embezzlement and negligence, there may be such a case (completely dismissed) because there is a dispute on both sides.
He also said: “If a third party has evidence, the person is also responsible for destroying the evidence. Therefore, if they do not have it, we will first inform them about discretionary presentation.”
However, he said: “In the case of a suspect or a suspect who is likely to become a suspect, he or she can destroy their evidence first. In that case, they must first obtain a seizure and search warrant and go to the scene to cooperate. “Please do this, request a random presentation,” he explained.
“Bankruptcy investigation? Criticism that does not correspond to the practice of a judicial order of seizure and search”
Some pointed out that it was a poor investigation into the rejection of all claims for seizure and search warrants. In this regard, lawyer Kim said: “Criticisms that do not correspond to the practice of the order of seizure and search.” “The seizure and search warrant is a necessary part of securing the data very early in the investigation,” he explained. “Before the suspect is called in, it is a seizure and search warrant to file a claim at a stage where there is no choice but to have data.”
Attorney Kim said, “All layoffs are not done well unless there is no other option,” he said. “Generally, some layoffs are limited to ‘things related to this case’ or the ‘main body of the PC’.” Just print the files inside, “he stressed.
Park jinman reporter [email protected]
Subscribe to the Hankook Ilbo News Naver channel
Balance to see the world, the Hankook Ilbo Copyright © Hankookilbo
[ad_2]