[ad_1]
The ruling and opposition parties continued a debate on the verification of the details of the use of expenses for special activities by the Ministry of Justice and the Prosecutor’s Office at the general meeting of the Special Budget and Liquidation Commission on the 10th. The battle For the truth of the special activities spending between the Minister of Justice, Choo Mi-ae, and the attorney general, Yoon Seok-yeol, it takes the form of a proxy war between the opposition parties.
The people’s power questioned the fact that the special expenditures for the prosecution went to the Ministry of Justice, which did not carry out investigations. At the general meeting of the preliminary committee on the same day, Representative Hae Jin Jo said, “What is the difference between using the special expenses allocated to the prosecutor’s office from the prosecutor’s office of the Ministry of Justice and the special expenses allocated to the National Intelligence Service (of the old regime)? ” You also have to weigh the pieces. “He argued:” If the Minister of Justice even ordered the prosecutor’s office to say that he was spending (special expenses) like pocket money, wouldn’t other ministries be reliable? “
In this regard, Hong Nam-ki, Deputy Prime Minister of Economy and Ministry of Strategy and Finance, said: “The Ministry of Justice also has some special expenses for various items such as correction, probation, institutional operation, immigration, transit, effective guard and crime prevention”. “It’s hard to tell him because I don’t know exactly what country (application) he was in.”
The Democratic Party raised the level of pressure to disclose the details of the special spending for the prosecution. Representative Chan-min Chung said in the plenary meeting of the Preliminary Committee on the same day: “If (the government) is not burdened, it is desirable to disclose this (the details of the use of special expenditures for government departments) as a whole, and if the government has the burden to do so, it is desirable to mobilize a national petition to disclose it. ” did. The Judiciary of the Democratic Party raised a problem with “the great sword did not disclose enough data” after the verification of the special expenses of execution of the great sword the day before. Regarding the request for disclosure of all special expenses, Vice Premier Hong expressed his displeasure, saying: “As the budget details (related to special expenses) are being carried out for special purposes, we are more cautious with the disclosure than other budget projects. Brazen conduct among ruling and opposition judges continued. Democratic Party lawmaker Song Ki-heon of the National Assembly Judiciary Committee appeared on MBC radio that day and asked, “How many percent of the prosecution’s total special activities expenditures were confirmed by the judicial committee the day before? ” He said: “It should be considered that it is less than 10-20% of the total.” The need for additional verification of expenses for special activities was mentioned. Representative Song emphasized that “Minister Chu did not dictate (the special expenses of the prosecution that went to the Ministry of Justice) at all.”
National Power Representative Jeon Ju-hye appeared on the same radio and said, “It was largely revealed that the suspicion raised by Minister Chu was unfounded.” I am pouring out my comments. “Regarding the Democratic Party’s request for additional verification of special expenditures, he said,” I do not believe that further investigation is necessary because the fundamental issue (raised by Minister Chu) has been resolved. ”
Reporter Kang Seong-hui go to reporter’s page [email protected]>
Copyright by dongA.com All rights reserved.
