[ad_1]
[앵커]
Since the first senior criminal investigation bureau has been confirmed to have 11 candidates, opposition parties also compete by force. Although the Democratic Party emphasized that the candidates for prosecutors recommended by the Popular Power are inappropriate as heads of the Public Ministry, they confronted the Democratic Party, which recommended the former judges, saying that the power of the people should be people with experience in investigation. Connect with reporters from the National Assembly. Reporter Song Jae-in! As soon as the preliminary candidate for the chief of the airlift is confirmed, it seems that war begins. Yes it is. First, starting with the 11 candidates for the first officially announced public prosecution, Justice Minister Choo Mi-ae recommended attorney Jeon Hyun-jung, who was previously the chief judge of the Seoul Central District Court. Cho Jae-yeon, head of the court administration department, appointed Choe Woon-sik, who served as head of the joint investigation department of the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office, as a preliminary candidate. The Democratic Party’s recommendation committee recommended two former judges, including lawyer Kwon Dong-joo and lawyer Jeon Jong-min. On the other hand, the recommending members of the People’s Power side recommended four high-ranking prosecutors, including lawyer Kang Chan-woo, lawyer Kim Kyung-soo, lawyer Seok Dong-hyun, and lawyer Son Ki-ho. In addition, Kim Jin-wook, Principal Investigator of the Constitutional Court recommended by the Korean Bar Association, Lee Geon-ri, Vice Chairman of the National Rights Commission, and Han Myung-gwan, lawyers, were appointed. The preliminary candidates recommended by the ruling and opposition parties are in stark contrast to former judges and prosecutors. With this, a war of nerves has already begun between the opposition parties. A Democratic Party official argued in a call with YTN that it would be inappropriate for a person with a supreme vision of the prosecution to become the head of an airlift aimed at reforming the institutions of power. The indictment is also the target of the prosecution’s investigation, and the former chief prosecutor for the prosecution noted that the “involvement around my family” type of investigation could be repeated. On the other hand, the People’s Power side faces the Democratic Party, which recommended former judges, saying that a person with research experience should become the chief of the airlift. In the call with YTN, the candidate member of the nominating committee of the Ministry of Public Transport should embrace the accusation rather than exclude it. He refuted that someone who can understand the prosecution’s investigation should become the chief of the airlift. The battle over preliminary candidates for the chief of the airlift is finally converging with the impeachment. The prosecution’s controversy over the costs of special activities continues today Yes, but today, the topic of controversy over the costs of special activities and the rivalry has changed. Earlier, the Democratic Party and Minister Choo Mi-ae raised the possibility of abuse of special activities expenses by Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeol and even carried out an on-site verification. But yesterday, the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office did not take an official position on the special performance expenses of the prosecution. Today, the power of the people is generating controversy over the costs of special activities of government ministries such as Minister Chu Miae and the Ministry of Justice. People’s Power Joo Ho-young, the head of the house, discussed the issue of expenses for special activities, but explained that in the field investigation, the Ministry of Justice interfered in the verification without providing adequate data. He even wrote a strong expression about Minister Chu’s attitude, saying that he was ‘crazy’. At the same time, the Ministry of Justice insisted that in principle it is not possible to pay special expenses, and insisted that it is necessary to check in all directions whether both Minister Chu and the former Ministers of Justice were illegally spending special expenses. The people’s power also refers to the special commission for the investigation of state affairs, and is trying to broaden the issue of the controversy over expenses of special activities from the prosecution to the Ministry of Justice and the government. YTN Song Jae-in in the National Assembly so far[[email protected]]it is.
