[ad_1]
A notice from the Seoul Metropolitan Bureau of Education’s response to the strike by dedicated front-school caregivers.
“I need to know if the school in charge of the strikes will guide the parents …”
On the 4th, two days before the primary care workers’ strike, a director sighed at the question of “how is the school situation?” This is due to the official letter distributed by the Office of Education, and at the end the content of the official letter is entered, which is the decision of the administration of the desk.
Since last month, primary care workers have announced a strike against the transfer of care classes to local governments and demanding a full-time work system. This is because teachers organizations previously supported the National Assembly special bill based on the transfer from local governments to local governments, and this is the claim that teachers can reduce administrative work and focus on The education. In this regard, care specialists argue that they can change part-time work that starts after school to full-time and take on administrative work.
At first glance, it is easy to dismiss it as selfishness of the two groups, but this problem originated from the ‘lack of detail’ of the educational authorities, who built solidarity classes in schools without a legal basis and made them grow over the years. years.
And the lack of detail is creating a situation where the school information cannot go out even one day before the welfare strike in this strike. The Ministry of Education, which had spoken with them only three times, proposed the formation of a ‘council for the improvement of primary care management’, in which related organizations participated and discussed the issue a few days before the strike. When there was no progress three days before the strike, the education office guided each school on how to respond, but frontline schools claimed they could not continue.
In terms of content, if a strike occurs on the 6th, you were asked to use a dedicated non-participating company, but it is unlikely to take place in today’s country where the number of solidarity class users is limited (around 10) due to Corona 19. If the solution is difficult, the classroom teacher and principal have said that they provide “ life guidance ” after school until the students return home, but there is a risk of being caught in a lawsuit due to the introduction of substitute staff for a care strike.
The best part is the Seoul Metropolitan Bureau of Education, which regulates and prohibits “calling union members to individually check if they participate in strikes” as unfair labor practices, but demanded in an official letter to prepare “self-care measures” for each school before the strike.
Even with the recommendation of the Office of Education, when we see a teacher who finds out if a dedicated company goes on strike or not, or when we see a teacher in charge of taking care of “ we will only participate in the morning strike and we will return to the care class ”, the care class will somehow operate even in a strike for one day on the 6th. However, as long as the urgent table administration is repeated, the conflict in the care class will be repeated and the anxiety of the parents will be repeated.
An official letter sent by the Seoul Metropolitan Bureau of Education to frontline schools ahead of the humanitarian strike on the 6th. The principal banned “individual confirmation of strike participation” from the caring squad as an unfair labor practice.
Yunjoo Lee reporter [email protected]
Subscribe to the Hankook Ilbo News Naver channel
Balance to see the world, the Hankook Ilbo Copyright © Hankookilbo
[ad_2]
