尹 Repeated “Living Power Research” … Growing Political Weight



[ad_1]

Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeol is answering questions from lawmakers by attending the State Administration of the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office of the Legislative Judicial Commission held at the National Assembly in Yeouido, Seoul on 22. 2020.10.22 / News1 © News1 Reporter Park Se-yeon

Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeol, who is battling with Justice Minister Chu Mi-ae, has expressed his willingness to investigate the “ living power. ” This is the position that Minister Chu took an hour after he said: “The words and actions and actions of the prosecution are undermining the political neutrality of the prosecution.”

According to the legal community on the 4th, Yoon gave a lecture to the new chief prosecutors of the Legal Affairs Training Institute in Jincheon, Chungcheongbuk-do on the 3rd, giving the meaning of reform to the prosecution, saying, “The crimes committed by social powers like the living power must be severely punished. ”

Yoon said, “The vision and goal of the prosecution reform is to ensure justice and equality in the criminal law enforcement process” and “to become a prosecutor by severely punishing the crimes of the strongest in society. “.

The participants said that in order to be reborn as the impeachment of the people, the purpose of the research was that the people wanted to be reborn, as well as the investigation of social power and living power that did not look left and right.

At the new prosecutor’s report ceremony in August, “Considering that all citizens of corruption and power-type corruption are potential stakeholders and victims, we must not reject any case and stand up and exercise police authority strictly delegated by the people. “Do the same with the ark.

Furthermore, it is similar to what President Moon Jae-in said in July last year, when granting a letter of appointment to President Yoon, calling for the completion of the prosecution reform and saying, “If there is corruption of the kind of power, be it the Blue House, the government or the ruling party, I hope it will be strict. ” Do.

Meanwhile, President Yoon has shown a constant or passive attitude in responding to Minister Chu’s “management of the massacre”, investigative command, and prosecution orders.

For example, at the time when Minister Chu accepted the first investigative command for the “Channel A Attempt to Force” case, Yoon announced that the minister’s investigative command was “training correct.” Among some prosecutors, complaints emerged about Yun’s interpretation of the idea that it is correct to immediately accept the minister’s order. He also expressed his disappointment with Yoon, who was unable to resist the unfair instructions.

This attitude has continued. At the New Prosecutor’s Office Report Ceremony in August, he made a deliberate comment, saying, “ We must confront the dictatorships of democracy ” and “ power-type corruption, ” but there were few cases where the presence revealed itself in succession, and in most cases it was silent.

General Yoon said that he was in a position to refrain from responding openly to various suspicions raised by the political world, maintaining the position that he had not misbehaved as a public official.

Then, after the Chuseok vacation, President Yoon started speaking in October. On October 18, President Yoon vigorously refuted the announcement to the Justice Ministry that the prosecution’s investigation into the ‘Cal Incident’ was insufficient, saying, “It is difficult to understand as it is slander.”

Four days later, the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office of the Judicial Commission of the National Assembly urged the illegality and impropriety of Minister Chu’s personnel procedures and the invocation of the power of investigation and command with unstoppable comments as “ the most dignified word for the slander ” and “ the president is not a subordinate of the minister. ” When asked if he was willing to participate in politics, he left a space to say, “Little by little I will think about how to serve the people.”

After the completion of the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office, President Yoon resumed the district office visiting program and gave a lecture to the chief prosecutor, revealing his presence as president.

Therefore, the reason why Minister Chu criticized “President Yoon’s words and actions and actions are undermining the political neutrality of prosecutors” in responding to a national petition before his conference with the attorney general. There is also speculation.

Inside and outside the legal profession, it is analyzed whether the criticism of the prosecutors’ criticism of Mr. Chu and the friendly atmosphere of the people towards Mr. Yoon about Mr. Yoon’s’ change ‘is reflected. It can also be interpreted as an expression of the will to adequately fill the remaining term without backing down despite pressure from politicians to resign.

◇ The harder you hit, the higher your preference for presidential candidates … Criticism Arrow

Currently, internal opposition from the prosecution has reached its peak, with more than 300 comments posted on the writings of other prosecutors criticizing Minister Chu’s reforms. On the other hand, President Yoon maintains a 10% mid-late opposition in various polls for the upcoming presidential elections.

“There was high public opinion about the prosecution reform at the time of former Minister Cho Kook, but there is a public opinion that the recent prosecution reform by Minister Chu has become ‘taming the prosecution.” I’m not doing it, “he said.

The ruling party carried out a counterattack operation day after day, monitoring President Yoon’s actions. Heo Young, a spokesman for the Democratic Party, made a comment that day, saying: “True reform of the prosecution must begin with reflection and complacency about the shameful past. Only reforms based on intense reflection can achieve real reforms.”

Representative Kim Yong-min of the same party criticized that “to mention the investigation of the living power, prosecutors should be able to freely investigate at least one living power within the prosecution, including himself, his family and his close friends.” “Ponder the ‘Republic of the Prosecutor’, which even created a case that was not found through Ha Myung’s investigation and biased political investigation.”

[email protected]



[ad_2]