“Should the reform be stopped so that dissent” … Continues the matrix of comments from prosecutors



[ad_1]

Justice Minister Choo Mi-ae is chatting with committee members at a ceremony for the nomination of a candidate for the position of head of the Office of Crime Investigation of Senior Public Officials (KAI) held in the National Assembly in Yeouido, Seoul, on the morning of the 30th. 2020.10.30 / News1 © News1

“Is it a reform of the prosecution service to stop prosecutors from issuing contrary opinions?”

Justice Minister Choo Mi-ae, pointing to prosecutors who criticized the current government’s prosecution reform, said: “If it turns out like this, reform alone is the answer,” and front-line prosecutors are protesting, saying : “Now you are blocking the word?” As of the 30th, about 210 prosecutors from the internal network of the prosecution posted supportive comments that said: “I also go out” and “deeply sympathize” with a fellow prosecutor who was the target of Minister Chu. The ‘online review meeting’ is estimated to have been convened, which is roughly one-tenth of the country’s 2,000 prosecutors. As many prosecutors have not been able to comment due to the treatment not submitted at the end of the month, participation in comments is expected to increase after the weekend.

● Exploits dissatisfaction with the “top-down” controller

The matrix of comments of the prosecutors is heavily based on the articles of two review prosecutors, each from years 11 and 13. First, on the 28th, the internal network said: “The reform of the prosecution has failed,” pointing out to Minister Chu, “the right to human resources, command and supervision rights are being abused. “We will have to take legal and political responsibility.” On the morning of the 29th, when Minister Chu posted an article on his Facebook page that seemed to define the prosecutor as a reform target, eight hours later, Choi Jae-man, the son-in-law of former Justice Minister Chun Jeong-bae, said: Regarding the title, “Prosecutors who do not comply with the government or who are critical of the government are being pushed as if they were a force against the reform of the prosecution service. I’ll go out too. ”Following Prosecutor Choi’s first article, the number of supportive comments from about 70 on the night of the 29th increased more than three times to 211 at 6pm on the 30th. In the comments, there are many voices pointing to the attitude of Minister Chu, who did not listen to internal criticism. Prosecutors in their 30s, who have been in office for less than 10 years, said: “It is very deplorable the reality of being ridiculed and criticized with only express opinions. “He protested firing A prosecutor in his 40s said:” I remember the ‘naked king’. “I want to become a child who has no sense of political affairs than a foolish servant who cannot tell the situation in the that the politician covers the accusation. “Another prosecutor commented:” Even if a member of the prosecution is criticized who has doubts, the essence of the ‘seizure of the prosecution by political power’ never changes.

● Evaluation of “Online review meeting after 7 years in fact”

The reason why the interior of the prosecution, which had been silent even as the authority of the prosecution, which had been restricted since 2005, was continually invoked, is because prosecutors are accepting the statements of the prosecution as a ‘repression. regulatory ‘. Prosecutors in the 3040s, who were silent on the conflict between Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeol and Minister Chu, actively responded to their colleagues’ submissions, and the possibility of convening a seven review audit meeting is under discussion. years after 2013. One of the lead prosecutors who attended the last review prosecutors meeting in 2013 said: “The two prosecutors who initiated the group comments were the senior prosecutors leading the convening prosecutors meeting, and many of the prosecutors who agree to this are mostly review prosecutors from the sub-supervisor level to first time prosecutors. ” He said: “It seems that an online review meeting is already taking place these days.” A recultivation exam prosecutor said: “These days, prosecutors are not friendly with the ‘top-down’ method of targeting from above and then down. The reform of the prosecution must be approached again with a ‘bottom-up’ method to solve from below, “he said.

● Ki-Jung Kang-Eun-Jung Lim “Prosecutors must be self-conscious”

Former secretary for presidential political affairs, Kang Ki-jeong, criticized on his Facebook page “the public is waiting for the magnetic exit” around 8 am on the 30th. About an hour after former chief Kang posted a post on Facebook , prosecutors policy researcher Im Eun-jeong said: “The prosecution is being criticized for too much karma. At the time when the condemnation of the events we had covered was taking place, it seemed that we should have left at least one of our magnetic voices ”. Prosecutors who saw this commented on the accusation as “it sounds like a ride on water” and “is bitter as it seems to say that only the person makes himself.”

Reporter Shin Dong-jin [email protected]
Reporter Godo Yes [email protected]

Close the window

Recommended item“Should the reform be stopped so that dissent” … Continues the matrix of comments from prosecutorsBest Recommended News

[ad_2]