[ad_1]
# In March 2019, the father of a high school student, Mr. A, asked Mr. B, an instructor at an admissions consulting academy in the Seoul area, to complete a presentation for the invention contest your child’s scientist. When the date of the invention contest was tight and school events and club interview schedules overlapped, he tried to receive the presentation without leaving.
# In April 2018, C, the father of a high school student, asked the same academy to write a script for his son’s book. The institute received the contest application form by email, wrote a book report, and sent the draft to Mr. C.
Large numbers of high school students preparing for the college entrance examination and comprehensive assessment of the student division have been caught by the police by performing theses and invention reports for various competitions and receiving money from officials from the Seoul Area Entrance Examination Academy and students who received awards with them. Notably, a suspicion has surfaced that leading academies are using entrance exam consulting to prepare contest submissions on behalf of candidates.
On the 29th, the Cyber Security Division of the Seoul Metropolitan Police Agency arrested E, the director of the admissions consulting academy, to the prosecution on charges of obstructing the execution of public affairs due to hierarchical or hierarchical work . Revealed. However, the police explained that the parents did not file a lawsuit, but according to the law, only the students who led the crime were limited. Principal E, a man in his 40s, recruited candidates who want to go to college through a comprehensive admissions screening from June 2017 to July last year, then appointed instructors in lieu of theses, books, inventions, etc. He is accused of writing, producing and transmitting it to students. It was investigated that the academy was paid between 1 million and 5.6 million won for work to students in exchange for scripts and masterpieces for tickets. Speakers who participated in this included professional workers and graduate students.
The academy students were found to present the result written on their behalf to the competition organizers as if they had created themselves and received an award.
The educational community believes that this crime may indirectly refer to external award records in living records and, in fact, broke a loophole in the current entrance examination system, where teachers cannot accurately verify whether they have passed or not. Unless a system is not supported that can complement fairness and transparency in hiring at any time, these incidents can reoccur. It is not possible to write the winning records as competitions in the life log book as is, but it is possible for the classroom teacher or the teacher in charge of the subject to comment on the student’s achievements and attach an explanation in the form of an opinion.
Gyeongwon Hanago’s teacher said, “If a student asks you to add vitality because you are interested in this, you have done a project.” “I did it.”
[김제림 기자 / 이윤식 기자][ⓒ 매일경제 & mk.co.kr, 무단전재 및 재배포 금지]
