[ad_1]
Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeol is answering questions from lawmakers by attending the state administration audit of the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office of the Legislative Judicial Commission held at the National Assembly in Yeouido, Seoul on the 22nd. Reporter Oh Jong -taek
Democratic Party lawmaker Park Beom-gye launched a fierce offensive against Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeol during a state administration audit of the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office of the Legislative Judicial Commission held at the National Assembly in Yeouido, Seoul on the day 22. Regarding the Optimus incident that caused the massive suspension of the redemption, you noted, did we not receive a report? “Why did the result of innocence come out?” At the beginning of the National Assembly, members of the ruling party, including Representative Park, pointed out Yoon’s attitude and yelled at him.
Representative Park said, “The Radio Promotion Agency has requested an investigation against Optimus based on the decision of the Ministry of Science, ICT and ICT. The amount of investment in public companies is close to 80 billion won. This is a case of private investment close to 320 billion won. ” “Can you decide to be innocent, lax?” He asked.
In response, Yoon replied, “I think I can do it.” Yoon also replied that “I have not received any reports” about the Optimus case. It is a position that the report was not published because it was the case of the presidential battle.
Bum-gye Park “Be straight!”
Representative Park said, “If General Yoon, who handed over the responsibility to the manager, had conducted the ‘Indian rain ritual investigation’ and ‘Infinity investigation’, which was swayed like the imperial family report, the private investment close to 1 trillion won last year would not be He said: “What did the president say about the Lime-Optimus incident? He said: ‘I will dry the tears of the victims.’ But didn’t you see the tears last spring? ”
General Yoon said of Optimus’s investigation at the time: “There was no damage (from the Radio Agency due to Optimus),” and said, “The Radio Agency was reported to have returned and suffered no harm.” .
In response, Congressman Park noted that “that is President Yoon’s short opinion” and noted that “only the Radio Promotion Agency saw no private investment (damage).”
President Yoon sighed briefly and said, ‘Huh, Cham’ as Park’s interrogation attack continued. Representative Park also pointed at Yoon, saying, “Get upright!”
Earlier, Congressman Park claimed that when the Radio Promotion Agency requested an investigation from the prosecution, it could have prevented the Optimus incident if the result of innocence had not been found. In May of last year, the Prosecutor’s Office was not charged with the request for an investigation by the Radio Agency.
So Byung-cheol “This attitude is the first time”
Democratic Party lawmaker So Byeong-cheol also made a comment noting Yoon’s attitude. Rep. So pointed out: “I have to answer only the words that the response attitude of the witness asks, but if I ask one, I answer 10. We have 7 minutes, but we don’t know who controls whom.”
Congressman So also yelled at Yun. Representative So said, “I changed my words because there was a perjury warning during the conversations of Representative Park Bum-gye and Kim Jong-min. I changed the word ‘not in memory,'” he noted.
When Yoon replied, “I was wrong climbing,” Congressman So suddenly yelled out loud, “Wait a minute!” Congressman So reiterated President Yoon’s attitude, saying: “It is not the order of the witnesses” and “I have never seen the national government in this way.”
Jang Je-won “Minister Chu Mi-ae is an arrogant visitor”
As the ruling party lawmakers continued to point out President Yoon’s attitudes, Representative Je-won Jang rebutted. He pointed to the attitude of Justice Minister Choo Mi-ae as the national supervisor, and said that President Yoon should also be fair. Representative Jang said, “President Yoon’s responsive attitude is dozens of times more polite than that of Minister Chu Mi-ae,” he said. “Minister Chu Mi-ae doesn’t even look at the members.”
He continued: “If there is a problem with the attitude of the witness, we should point it out correctly, but we should have been seriously warned about the attitude of Minister Chu Mi-ae and asked us to sit down and answer the questions of the opposition party member.” There was no problem with the content? ”
Representative Jang noted, “Stand still with the arrogant attitude and scold those who give detailed explanations.”
Reporter Oh Wonseok [email protected]
[ad_2]
