Jin Joong-kwon “The withdrawal of Keum Tae-seop proves that the Democratic Party has become a group.”



[ad_1]

Jin Jung-kwon, former professor at Dongyang University.  News 1

Jin Jung-kwon, former professor at Dongyang University. News 1

Jin Jung-kwon, a former professor at Dongyang University, criticized on Facebook on the 21st as “The significance of Keum Tae-seop’s withdrawal is proof that the Democratic Party has transformed into a group that cannot reasonably communicate “.

Professor Jin compared the Democratic Party, represented by Tae-seop Geum, to North Korean society, where only one opinion is allowed.
“North Korea is a pure society. Within it, only an opinion is allowed, and those with disagreements are eliminated as foreign substances. It may appear strong on the outside, but it is actually a very vulnerable system,” he said. “Even a small foreign object can expose the fiction of the system.” I’m scared of that, so I walk and close the door. The Democratic Party has become even more pure with the withdrawal of Representative Tae-seop Geum. ”

Then, “the withdrawal of Representative Tae-seop Geum was defined as an event that shows that the Democratic Party is no longer a liberal party” and “the Democratic Party has no place for such a liberal party.”

“The concept of ‘democracy’ of the people of the Democratic Party is different from what we think of ‘liberal democracy’.” It is about mobilizing the public through propaganda under the direct combination of ”.

“Moon Jae-in’s regime is not Kim Dae-jung-Roh Moo-hyun’s regime. Moon Jae-in’s regime has 586 regimes,” he said. “Unfortunately, this generation has never learned ‘liberal democracy’ properly. Park Jung-hee’s ‘Korean-style democracy’ through high school, and activist power when he got to ‘People’s Democracy’ college, that’s all. they’ve learned about democracy. So they probably don’t even know why that’s the problem. ”

He concluded by saying, “Congratulations,” saying, “Anyway, a liberal democracy is simply a ‘disease’ for the Democratic Party. The withdrawal of Rep. Tae-seop Geum is a cure for the liberal democracy the Democratic Party has been suffering from. “, He said.

Meanwhile, in another post, Professor Jin mentioned the possibility that former legislator Geum could run for mayor of Seoul next year. “It’s still too early to talk about this, but if he comes out anyway, my vote will go to him.” And he showed his support.

Jung-Kwon Jin professional from Facebook

In the Democratic Party, you’ll want to try to devalue the significance of Rep. Tae-seop Geum’s withdrawal. It means that “there is no need to give much meaning to the decision of a natural person.” There are some people who swear like ‘migratory birds’ like Kim Nam-guk, while others like Chung Cheong-rae congratulate his retirement as ‘good job for the party’. Moon fans say, ‘It’s great because the sick person is missing.

The significance of Keum Tae-seop’s withdrawal is that it is proof that the Democratic Party has transformed into a group where rational communication is impossible. Park Yong-jin said, “I should have tried to change it inside,” but he came out because he judged it impossible. I also believe that Representative Tae-seop Geum’s judgment is correct. Even if the words are like that, Congressman Park himself will think so.

North Korea is a pure society. Only one opinion is allowed on it, and those with disagreements are removed as foreign substances. It may look strong on the outside, but it is actually a very weak system. Even very small foreign objects can expose the fiction of the system, so you are afraid to close the door and live. The Democratic Party became even more pure with the withdrawal of Congressman Tae-seop Geum.

The withdrawal of Representative Tae-seop Geum is an event that shows that the Democratic Party is no longer a liberal party. Liberals acknowledge differences of opinion and try to reduce them to dialogue. Pluralism that recognizes the diversity of opinions and the peaceful resolution of problems through dialogue. This is the beginning of liberalism. But the Democratic Party has no place for such a liberal.

As my sister has pointed out, this is because the concept of “democracy” that Democrats have is different from what we think of “liberal democracy.” To see the distinction between enemies and children as the essence of politics, to push the majority with the power of the majority without respecting the minority, and to mobilize the public through propaganda under the direct union of the public and the leader. These are phenomena unknown to liberal democracy.

Moon Jae-in’s regime is not Kim Dae-jung-Roh Moo-hyun’s regime. Moon Jae-in’s regime is regime 586. Unfortunately, this generation has never really learned “liberal democracy.” Park Jeong-hee’s ‘Korean colonialism’ until high school, and the movement’s ‘people’s democracy’ when they got to college, this is all the democracy they learned. So you probably don’t even know why that’s the problem.

The significance of Rep. Tae-seop Geum’s withdrawal is that the only liberal Democrat within the Democratic Party could not bear it and eventually had to leave the party. It is also good for the Democrats. After all, a liberal democracy is nothing more than a sick person to democrats. The withdrawal of Representative Tae-seop Geum was cured of the liberal democracy that the Democratic Party had suffered until now. Congratulations.

Reporter Lee Hae-jun [email protected]





[ad_2]