Yoon Seok-yeol’s family case, a year ago, the ruling party was rather ‘protected’ … “Lee Hyeon-ryeong-bi Hyeon-ryeong”



[ad_1]

Enter 2020.10.20 10:12 | Review 2020.10.20 10:36

Most of the family-related cases in which Justice Minister Choo Mi-ae wielded the second investigative power of command, such as the case of Kim Gun-hee, wife of Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeol, who held the second I commanded an investigator a year ago. It was confirmed that he actively defended. The case where the ruling party raised its voice saying “Scratch the Attorney General” is now more of a means of tying Yun’s hands and feet, and some legal circles even point out that it is “Lee Hyeon-ryeongbi”.

Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeol is on the morning of the 20th to work at the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office in Seocho-gu, Seoul. / yunhap news

According to the police authorities on the 20th, there were four cases related to family close-ups that Minister Chu ordered the day before to receive only the results of the investigation. △ Cobana money and property case, △ Dutch manipulation of Deutsche Motors share price and accusations of preferential sale of Deutsche Financial shares △ Illegal operation of nursing hospitals and suspicion of Mouma △ The case of bribery and suspicion of Mouma, former head of the Yongsan tax office.

The ‘Konava money and delivery case’ is a suspicion that a company run by Kim Gun-hee, President Yoon’s wife, held an exhibition last June and received sponsorship money from some companies. At the time, it was around the time that Yoon was nominated as a candidate for attorney general, for which he offered so-called ‘insurance kickbacks’.

However, President Yoon’s audience preparation team refuted that “the sponsorship of the exhibition was completed before Yun was nominated as a candidate.” The companies on the sponsor list also explained: “It was not Kim’s company, it was sponsoring the media, who are the organizers.”

At President Yun’s personal audience, lawmakers from the ruling party expressed the same logic as business. “The spouse-related business was not sponsored,” said Kim Jong-min, a member of the Democratic Party. “The fact itself. It is the press that received the sponsorship.”

The suspicion that his wife, Kim and his mother-in-law, Choi (74), were involved in manipulating the prices of shares related to Deutsche Motors between 2009 and 2011 was also investigated. This is a suspicion that was raised based on the internal investigation report made by the police in 2013. The police ignored it during the internal investigation stage and ended. Deutsche Motors Chairman Kwon Oh-soo recently explained to the media that “the Financial Supervision Service has concluded that the share price is not allegedly manipulated.”

Furthermore, Deutsche Motors previously argued that this was a general case of participation as an individual investor in the early days of the establishment of a private company, with respect to the suspicion that Mr. Kim enjoyed preferential treatment when acquiring Deutsche shares. Financial at face value. Rather, Deutsche Financial was said to be a company that had suffered a significant deficit during the four years since its inception in 2013.

Part of an official letter of investigation and order issued by the Minister of Justice, Chu Mi-ae, on the 19th / Provided by the Ministry of Justice

Minister Chu also led an investigation into the suspicion that Yoon’s mother-in-law Choi invested in a medical corporation in 2012, was punished for violating medical law, but only Choi was not arrested and Yoon was not reckless.

At that time it was known that the charges were not recognized from the stage of the police investigation. Regarding the suspicion, Choi said: “I have not been involved in the administration of the hospital, nor do I get paid or go to work.” Revealed. He also said: “Rather, a victim who did not get the investment money back.”

The case in which Chung Dae-taek, who filed more than 20 civil and criminal lawsuits over 17 years due to business relationships with Choi, filed a complaint with the prosecution, was also listed as “another investment-related complaint” as the subject of investigation. Jeong attended the Seoul Central District Prosecutor’s Office as an accuser in September and said, “Mr. Choi was framed.”

In the past, however, ruling party lawmakers evaluated it as a ‘scratch’ during President Yoon’s personal audience. Democratic Party lawmaker Park Ju-min said: “At the end of the Park Geun-hye administration, the Blue House contacted a person named Jeong Dae-taek in the process of obtaining information about candidate Yoon. Suk-yeol in various ways, and reported a transcript that he received data. ” “I did it.”

‘Daeyoon’, Yoon’s close friend ‘Soyun’, was also deprived of command in the bribery case of the close friend of the brother of the former head of the Yongsan Tax Office Yun Woo-jin Yoon Dae-jin. Yoon, a former CEO, was arrested for fleeing abroad during a police investigation on charges of receiving tens of millions of won in money from a meat importer in 2012, but after 22 months, prosecutors dismissed him, raising suspicions. research.

However, at the staff hearing, legislators from the ruling party advocated for Yoon, saying that both the then Minister of Justice and the Seoul Central District Prosecutor’s Office belonged to the opposition party and should be brought forward as witnesses.

These cases are being investigated by the Seoul Central District Prosecutor’s Office, Criminal Division 6 (Director Park Soon-bae). After being reorganized by the First Criminal Division, the investigation has been serious since last month, including Hwang Hee-seok, former head of the Human Rights Office at the Ministry of Justice, and other accusers. Minister Chu invoked the investigation command the previous day and ordered the Seoul Central District Prosecutor’s Office to “strengthen the investigation team to investigate promptly and thoroughly.”

** Based on the reader’s point, Ioryeongbieoryeong is corrected because it is the origin of Lee Hyunryeongbihyeonryong.

[ad_2]