[ad_1]
Former Star Mobility president Bong-Hyun Kim, who was designated as the prelude to the Lime Asset Management crisis and a key figure in lobbying for political relations. (Photo = Yonhap News)
Lime and politicians over the Optimus Fund’s political relations lobbying allegations have heated up even more. The ruling and opposition parties are very excited when the “ prison exposure ” of former Star Mobility president Kim Bong-hyun, the main culprit in the Lime case, was reported that the money and property lobby not only it was on the passport side but also on the opposition party side.
The tense ruling party launched a counterattack, saying the case had to be dealt with by the air defense department (the criminal investigation office for senior officials), and the confused opposition party began investigating the substance through special prosecution. In the second semester, the Auditor of the National Assembly of the National Assembly is expected to be the main scene of the conflict.
◇ The ruling party’s change of position “needs a separate investigation”
The ruling party, which said the two cases were simply “financial fraud cases,” turned offensive. Lime Kim Bong-hyun, who is incarcerated, changed his position after suddenly claiming that he had handed money to an opposition politician from the previous prosecution.
Democratic Party spokesman Shin Young-dae said on the 18th: “If Kim’s claim is revealed to be true through prosecution by the Ministry of Justice, a separate investigation of the financial fraud case will be needed.” He said.
There is also the intention to issue an issue of the launch of the airlift as an excuse to investigate this case. Chief spokesman Choi In-ho wrote on Facebook: “There is a claim that he should be the first subject of investigation by the air defense agency, and that it should be the case with the disclosure of Kim Bong-hyun” and ” a reasonable argument “.
◇ The opposition party said to be unhappy, “Let’s take a special prosecution”
On the other hand, the power side of the people is repentant. The opposition point of view is that the perspective of the opposition party is that the name of an official of the opposition party is embedded in the general case of the lobby towards the passport.
“The opposition prosecutor’s office who appeared in the prosecution only assumed the contract as a lawyer,” said in a call with CBS Norcut News, a member of the special committee of ‘Ras Gate (Lime-Optimus Power-type Viri Gate)’ . If that’s the problem, it’s okay to take the person to court. “
However, it is believed that the prosecution cannot be trusted under the command of ‘Chumiae Line’ or the airlift in which the president has final appointment authority. Therefore, it is required that a special prosecutor be organized as an independent person.
Ho-young Joo met with reporters after the General Assembly meeting on the same day and said, “I will use all means to carry out a special prosecution.”
In addition, the member of the Democratic Party Kim Gyeong-hyup (left) and the National Power Joo Ho-young (photo = photo of the material)
◇ Reverse Proposal by ‘Investor’ Kim Gyeong-hyup Removes Opposition Party
Some members of the Democratic Party also commented that they accepted the opposition party’s demand for a special trial with conditions.
Democratic Party lawmaker Kim Gyeong-hyup, who was belatedly revealed to be a party that invested in the Optimus Fund and repurchased without damage, said at a press conference claiming his innocence: “I agree with the argument of revealing each and every one of the details with a special prosecutor. “
Meanwhile, ① the opposition party appoints a member recommended by the Ministry of Public Affairs and ② if he identifies himself as a simple investor, Ho-young Joo, the national power of the House, proposed to resign from the council.
It means that if the opposition party accepts it, it will persuade the party to accept the special prosecution. However, an official from the party leadership drew a line saying that “it is only an individual opinion” and that “it has not been discussed at the leadership level.”
In the power of the people, he dismissed it as a “Yabawi-style proposal.” Hospital spokesman Bae Hyun-jin said: “It is a sophism that the subject of suspicion is sitting with another legislator” and asked: “Would you like to use the position of the legislators entrusted by the public as a means of betting? “.
State audit of the Legislative and Judicial Committee of the National Assembly (Photo = Journalist Yoon Chang-won / photo material)
◇ Presentation of slander in the Judicial Commission / Political Affairs Commission
The ‘Lime-Opti’ case is expected to become a key issue in the second half of the state administration audit.
Consultations on the Seoul Southern District Prosecutor’s Office in charge of the Lime case and the Seoul Central District Prosecutor’s Office investigating Optimus will take place in the judicial committee on the 19th.
Kim Bong-hyun’s claim that “the opposition staff lobby was declared, but the investigation was not carried out” and the suspicion that “the Optimus case is not being underestimated within the prosecution” will be addressed during the investigation process.
The difference between the opposition parties surrounding Minister of Justice Choo Mi-ae and Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeol is expected to be particularly notable in the Seoul Central District Prosecutor’s Office on the 20th and in the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office on the 22nd. .
On the 23rd, the aunt lawyer, who was a key figure in the Optimus Fund fraud and administrator of the Blue House Civil Administration Office, was selected as a witness to the audit of the financial supervision service on the 23rd.
