[ad_1]
On the 17th, lawmakers from the Democratic Party repeatedly criticized the accusation and re-emphasized the need to reduce the authority of the prosecution. The prison entrance of former Star Mobility president Kim Bong-hyun, who was designated as the main culprit in the ‘Cal Incident’, was released. The day before, former President Kim raised suspicions of the prosecution’s “flawed investigation” through his position statement, saying, “I think the prosecution reform should be made clear.” At the same time, he complained of resentment and said, “I am not a rhyme or my body.”
Lawmakers from the Democratic Party, who have generally insisted on “ reducing the authority of the prosecution, ” launched a critical message on Facebook earlier this day. Democratic Party lawmaker Kim Nam-guk said: “Once again, we realize the need for ‘democratic control’ over the prosecution“Regardless of Kim Bong-hyun’s intentions, whether it is true or not must be revealed.” Representative Kim also told the Ministry of Justice:Prosecutors who suspect entertainment and entertainment should be immediately excluded from the investigation and thoroughly inspected.Said.
Democratic Party lawmaker Kim Yong-min also said: “Kim Hak-eui (former Deputy Justice Minister) denied that it was not himself, and the prosecution believed that word.”Even in the Lime incident, the prosecution’s excuses must be omitted and judged, and the truth is likely to be discovered.Said. The day before, he said, “The Ministry of Justice decided to directly inspect prosecutors for alleged corruption related to Lime. He also left a position on Facebook saying, “Welcome to the quick decision.”
Along with Democrat Hwang Unha,Three more years have passed since the Moon Jae-in administration was launched, but the prosecution has not been reformed.And he ordered stronger measures. Representative Hwang argued: “As long as the prosecution directly exercises the right of investigation, ‘consistent investigation’ and corruption are inevitable.”
Political officials explained that this movement “is not alien to the situation in which a conflict was scheduled between the president and the opposition parties over the airlift at the end of this month.” Previously, the Democratic Party set a deadline of the 26th and demanded that the power of the people cooperate with the launch of the Airborne Department (Office of Crime Investigation of High-Level Public Officials). There have also been several times when he has expressed his intention on various occasions that if the nomination of the candidate nominating committee for the Minister of Air Transport is not made by this day, the amendment to the Air Transport Law will be applied. Democratic Party spokesman Kang Sun-woo also discussed the Lime-Optimus case that day, saying: “The reason for the launch of the airlift is urgent.”
People’s power “Is it the adherence of rights and criminals?”
On the other hand, members of the Popular Force suggested the ‘introduction of special prosecutors’ as an alternative. Representative Kim Woong of the People’s Power said on Facebook the day before to Minister of Justice Chu Mi-ae: “You will not fall into the contradiction that you believe in the hospitality of the hall and you cannot believe in Kang Ki-jeong.”Special prosecutors and special prosecutors are required, not inspection.He insisted. People’s Power spokesman Yoon Hee-seok also said in the day’s commentary, “It is now difficult to fully trust the prosecution’s investigation. If so, it would be prudent to entrust the investigation to an independent special prosecutor’s office.”
In the hands of the people, opinions were expressed that raised questions about the background to this incident. Kim Geun-sik, the power of the people, President Song Pa-byeong of SeoulIs it now ‘Rubber adhesion (檢) criminal (犯)’ after ‘Rubber adhesion (檢) tongue (言)’?“If the ‘prosecutor’s office’ was directed at prosecutor Han Dong-hoon, the ‘prosecutor’s office’ could target the opposition party and attorney general Yoon Seok-yeol.”
President Kim said: “As the ‘demonstration collusion’ is finally summed up in the suspected ‘gwon-eon collusion’, a joint effort between the ‘Daekkaemun’ reporter and the ruling broadcaster, how will this be concluded? ‘proven collusion’ “.It is necessary to clarify whether it is indeed a ‘prosecutors’ association’, or if it is a ‘criminal gwon (·) · adhesion (犯)’ that tries to re-tie the accusation with false statements by criminals to protect power.He insisted.
Reporter Oh Hyunseok [email protected]
[ad_2]