[ad_1]
“It takes less than 30 seconds.”
At the trial of Dongyang University professor Chung Gyeong-shim, who was indicted by the prosecution for alleged corruption in the children’s entrance examination, Professor Chung himself demonstrated the falsification process, claiming that he had falsified the subpoena of his daughter Jomo. Until now, Professor Jeong’s side has insisted on the suspicion of dating forgery: “I have to use a professional program like Photoshop, but this is something that Professor Jeong, who is an ‘immune’, cannot do.”
On the 15th, at Professor Jeong’s hearing, held at the Hearing on Part 25-2 of the Seoul Central District Court Criminal Agreement (Presiding Judge Lim Jeong-yeop), the prosecution directly demonstrated the process of creating and printing of a falsified file by bringing a printer and a listing form used by Tong Yang University in court. . The judge previously asked the prosecution: “I wish to demonstrate to the prosecution from the outset that the subpoena occurred in the way that Professor Jeong did.”
On this day, the prosecution repeatedly referred to Professor Jeong’s forgery date (June 16, 2013) written in the complaint during the demonstration as “forgery day”. The prosecution captured the seal of the president of Tong Yang University from the certificate file of Professor Chung’s son Cho, and then attached the captured image to the daughter’s citation file. Then, I printed the Tong Yang University list paper, printed the document, and sent the completed subpoena document to the court. The printed document apparently resembled a formal appointment. The prosecution said: “There is no need for a specialized program, and the MS Word program that Professor Jeong is familiar with is sufficient.” “Only one Jeong professor used MS Word at Dongyang University. Even Professor Jeong is insisting on that. “In response, Professor Jeong’s lawyer argued that” the prosecution’s demonstration method is different from what was mentioned in the prosecution. “Regarding the prosecution’s use of the expression “day of forgery”, he asked not to write and said: “The prosecution is naming.” The judge accepted the objection and asked the prosecution to describe it as a “day of forgery.”
At the trial that day, evidence was also presented showing the circumstances in which Dankook University professor Jang Young-pyo, who registered Professor Jung’s daughter Cho, who was a high school student, as the first author of a medical article, he judged himself inappropriate. When Professor Jang received an inquiry from his daughter Cho asking if he could submit the achievements of his thesis for admission to the Seoul National University School of Medicine in 2013, he said: “I regret the fact that the first author of the thesis was not registered. If the Seoul National University medical staff interviewer asks about this, please confess honestly. “
Reporter Yoo Won-mo [email protected]
Copyright by dongA.com All rights reserved.
