[ad_1]
When a Newsis photographer went to report to the entrance to Minister Choo Mi-ae’s apartment building, the Newsis side actively refuted that it was difficult for Newsis to access the Facebook post of Minister Chu, who criticized him for obstructing the work.
It is argued that public activity outside the home of a public figure cannot be considered as a private life, and that public activities begin when a public figure drives a public vehicle, which is owned by the country. Newsis announced that it will continue its reporting activities within the allowed range.
Justice Minister Choo Mi-ae said in his Facebook post on the morning of the 15th: “This morning a Newsis reporter appeared with a camera in front of the entrance to the apartment.” “I sent an official letter to each media company and the journalist said that he would continue to spread that he did not know.” Minister Chu said, “Because it interferes with work, I will have to wait at home and work until the situation is over.”
“For the past nine months, the media have photographed my entire body anywhere,” Minister Chu said. Minister Chu wrote, “As if we were dealing with a vicious criminal, we also posed questions that did not fit from one side to the other.”
However, Minister Chu took the Newsis photographer’s face, uploaded it as is, and then mosaic it.
With this, Newsis replied that it was difficult to agree with Minister Chu’s argument. “We have concluded that our reporter has not particularly infringed on privacy,” said Jung Moon-jae, CEO of Newsis, a press spokesman on the afternoon of the 15th. Managing Director Jeong said, “In the past When President Moon Jae-in left his sister-in-law and went to work, he took all the pictures. I cannot agree with the above. “
Managing Director Jung said: “Since Minister Chu Mi-ae’s family is a cause of death, they will not violate his privacy, and the basic position is that we will continue our information activities within the range allowed for public figures and within the range of our common sense. “
When asked if he was protesting the reporter’s photo uploaded without mosaics, Jung said, “No,” he said. “Minister Chu made a personal statement on Facebook, a personal social network, and the protest was ridiculous, so he did not broadcast the official position.” Answered. He said he was not communicating informally. When asked if it was wrong to upload photos without mosaic treatment, Jung did not officially reveal his position.
In response to the question, ‘Did Minister Chu ask not to shoot directly on this day?’, Managing Director Jung said, “I received a report after the fact, and it was requested by a reporter in the Ministry of Justice.” I don’t think I haven’t. It’s a request for restraint, not a binding decision, it’s just your opinion, and if reporters need it, why don’t you report it anywhere?
“It is difficult to confirm that” when asked whether the content of Minister Chu’s post was correct, he said: “Even if the reporter (Newsis photo reporter) does not know, I will continue to spread it,” Jung replied, “It is difficult to confirm that. .
When asked if the content of Minister Chu’s writings that reporters covered Chu’s apartment every day for nine months was correct, Jung said, “I don’t know if it’s every day, but I know that they did it if necessary. “. “Isn’t filming something our society admits?” Managing Director Jeong said, “The moment a public official travels in a public car, they begin their activities in the use of the country’s property,” he said. “When he leaves the house, it is difficult to agree with the claim that his privacy is violated until the time of filming.”
In response to Minister Chu’s protest that “the main door of the apartment, which is a private living space, was also invaded,” Jung said, “I know (our reporters) that this has never happened. I think it is a misunderstanding. “. What good is photographing the entrance of an apartment? It is not even meaningful to the reader. “
In response to Minister Chu’s criticism that “as if he was dealing with a vicious criminal, he also poured out questions that were not right,” Jung said, “I know our journalists did not do such a rude job.” “And Minister Chu’s expression was excessive. Minister Chu pointed out that the controversial issue itself is a sensitive issue, so I think I can think so, but the expression was excessive.” He said, “We maintain our coverage ethic.” he said. “We do not do such rude rudeness as treating the minister as a vicious criminal.”
Copyright © Media Today, unauthorized reproduction and redistribution are prohibited.
[ad_2]
