[ad_1]
Ministry of Foreign Affairs “Efforts to hold the Korea-China-Japan Summit in the year”
Japan demands that mandatory compensation for compulsory military service be resolved as a condition of attending the meeting
The government cannot intervene in the judicial process due to the separation of three volumes
[앵커]
In response to Japan’s position to increase compensation for conscription as a condition for attending the Korea-China-Japan summit, the Korean government announced that it would endeavor to hold the meeting within this year. While both the victims and Japan are struggling to find acceptable solutions, the process of selling Japanese corporate assets is slow but continuous. This is reporter Dowon Kim. The Foreign Ministry declined to respond to reports that Japan requested to resolve the issue of compulsory military service as a condition for attending the Korea-China-Japan summit. However, he once again emphasized his willingness to hold the trilateral summit this year. This summit, which is the turn of the three countries to take place in Korea, is being held in turn due to the conflict between Korea and Japan and Corona 19. Japan has continued to require that Japanese corporate assets not be sold in connection with mandatory compensation for mandatory military service. However, for the Korean government, the administration cannot intervene in the judiciary process. Last month, President Moon Jae-in spoke with Prime Minister Suga to find a solution that everyone can accept “together”, but Japan maintains the position that it is a problem that has already ended with a claims settlement. Meanwhile, the Japanese corporate asset sale process went one step further. Recently, our court has also publicly administered the litigation documents for the sale of shares owned by Shin Il-cheol shares seized by victims of compulsory military service, which will take effect on December 9. Although there is a long way to go until the actual sale, Japan is in a position to retaliate when it is converted to cash. Furthermore, Japan’s demand for the removal of the Berlin girl statue in Germany is also emerging as a problem in Korean-Japanese relations. The Foreign Ministry criticized Japan as a measure against the spirit of apology that Japan has declared to itself, saying it is considering appropriate responses. While Japan maintains its position in the Abe period on historical issues, a pessimistic view is emerging that it will be difficult to improve relations between Korea and Japan, even if the prime minister changes. I am YTN Kim Do-won.
