[ad_1] On July 20, in front of the Financial Supervision Service in Yeouido, Seoul, victims of Optimus Asset Management's private equity investments protested demanding the return of their investments. Base photo The suspicion of lobbying related to Optimus Asset Management and Lime Asset Management has been raised day after day. The power of the people also continues the offensive in the audit of state affairs. The mentioned parties strongly oppose taking legal action, saying they are "out of work". It flows in the form of a workshop of truth. In the midst of this, it is also controversial whether the prosecution has conducted a timely investigation. The prosecution hopes to look back to see if there are any aspects that have raised suspicions. With respect to Optimus, suspicions arose following reports that the prosecution had not investigated adequately despite the fact that the prosecution obtained an internal document containing the actual names and titles of some 20 members of the political and related staff. The prosecution said: "Some real names are listed, but reports indicate that the real names of the Blue House and political figures are completely different from the facts." Former Attorney General Chae Dong-wook and Gyeonggi Governor Gyeonggi Lee Jae-myeong, who are known to appear in the document, also refute the lobbying allegations. However, an investigation to verify the authenticity of the document is essential. A new suspicion has also been raised that the prosecution has confirmed the fact that attorney Lee Amu-gae, wife of Optimus Yoon's director (moderation), changed her stake in Optimus to the new name when she was serving as executive officer of the Blue House Office of Civil Affairs. Aside from criminal penalties, if the former administrator has not adequately investigated the possibility of being the "project beneficiary" in the document, he cannot escape the "prospective investigation" controversy. Regarding the rhyme, the suspicion of receiving 50 million won from former Blue House president Ki-jeong Kang is controversial. The prosecution said former Star Mobility CEO Lee Kang-se confirmed the circumstances in which he received cash from former President Kim Bong-hyun, but has not been able to obtain physical evidence that former Representative Lee delivered this. to former director Kang. On the 12th, former Chief Kang also sued former President Kim, who testified in court that he had offered him money and other property. There appears to be a possibility of a 'delivery accident', but it is worth considering whether it is appropriate for the prosecution not even to investigate former Chief Kang even after hearing former CEO Lee's statement during the investigation. On the 12th, the prosecution decided to significantly strengthen the team to investigate an alleged fraud at the Optimus Fund. Justice Minister Choo Mi-ae also announced that while he promised to increase the investigation team, he requested the extradition of the criminal against Optimus founder Lee Hyeok-jin, who is abroad. The strong will to investigate was fully revealed. Now is the time to reveal the real truth through a quick and thorough investigation. [ad_2]
