[ad_1]
On the ninth day of Hangeul, the wall of a police car reappeared in Gwanghwamun Square to prevent illegal urban gatherings. On the 8th, in the audit of the National Administration and Security Committee of the state administration, the ruling party and the National Police Agency explained that the police barrier that blocked the passage of citizens was a “legal measure” and that it is inevitable for Crown prevention 19. However, Rep. Park Soo-young rebutted, citing President Moon Jae-in’s tweet in 2015 that “Korea’s democracy was blocked by the government’s unconstitutional police bloc.” The controversy over the wall of the police car was summarized in photos.
① 2002 Hyo-soon Lee Mi-seon Memorial Meeting
According to the police, it is difficult to specify when the barrier tactics first appeared. However, it was in 2002 when a high school student was sacrificed to a United States Army armored vehicle that it became controversial after showing up at a large demonstration. At this time, citizens held protests demanding the revision of the ROK-US Administrative Agreement (SOFA).
② The appearance of a rally against American meat ‘Myung Park Sanseong’
In June 2008, to stop protesters against the importation of American beef, the police controlled Sejongno by welding containers to the ground. The space between the container and the road was blocked by a police bus, but it was closer to the container wall rather than a full wall of the vehicle. At that time, citizens criticized the container with a banner “Is this communication MB-style?”
③ In 2011, the police car wall was unconstitutional
During a commemoration of former President Roh Moo-hyun in May 2009, the organizers tried to cross Seoul Square. However, it was blocked by the wall of the police car and could not pass. Participatory Solidarity filed a constitutional complaint against the Commissioner of the National Police Agency, alleging that freedom of residence and relocation was violated. In 2011, the Constitutional Court raised the hands of the solidarity participants with 7 unconstitutional opinions versus 2 constitutional opinions. At that time, the Constitution explained that “even if there is the possibility of an illegal or violent assembly or demonstration, police action must be carried out to the minimum extent necessary according to individual and specific circumstances.”
④The ruling of the Supreme Court of ‘Geun Hye Jangseong’ was different
In 2017, the Supreme Court ruled that the police could not consider it illegal in relation to the 2015 Popular Rally. The court found it to be legal because the police had no other means to curb the risk of damage other than the wall of the vehicle, and that the street was quickly dismantled at the point where illegal activities such as protesters took over the road.
⑤ Constitutional Constitution in 2020 “Judge against the public interest”
The wall of the police car, which appeared in the assembly on the first day of the year and the Hangeul, remains controversial and says: “We will prevent the spread of Corona 19, which is the unprecedented situation in history.” You have to compare and judge what this is. ”
Reporter Kyung-Hyun Kyung-Hyun [email protected]
[ad_2]