[ad_1]
Ahn Tae-geun, a former attorney general, leaves the court after being acquitted at a pretrial detention court hearing held at the Seoul Central District Court in Seocho-gu, Seoul, on the morning of 29 last month. [뉴스1]
Former prosecutor Ahn Tae-geun, who was handed over to trial for “ personal retaliation ” against prosecutor Seo Ji-hyun, was not guilty because the prosecution did not appeal again. It was also pointed out to the Prosecutor’s Office that a “ trap ” was interposed when requesting a change of accusation in the repatriation process for the destruction of the Security Prosecutor’s Office.
Deadline for new appeal, up to the last 6 days … Possible claim for criminal compensation
According to law enforcement officials on the 7th, the deadline for re-appealing to the security prosecutor, who was found not guilty in pretrial detention court on the 29th of last month, was until the 6th. However, the prosecution did not appeal again, and as a result, prosecutor Ahn Jeon was found not guilty.
Upon final confirmation of innocence by the security attorney, you can claim criminal compensation. On that day, the court sent a certified copy of the sentence and confirmation of the sentence, and a notice of criminal compensation claims to the security prosecutor.
Prosecutor Ahn Jeon, who was the head of the Prosecutor’s Office of the Ministry of Justice and oversees the personal affairs of the prosecutor’s office, was brought to trial in 2015 for unfairly intervening in the appointment process for the Changwon District Prosecutor’s Office of the Section of Yeoju from the Suwon District Prosecutor’s Office. Both were convicted in the first and second trials and sentenced to two years in prison. The sexual harassment case against prosecutor Seo was excluded from the charges beyond the period during which the complaint was possible.
On the other hand, the Supreme Court destroyed and repatriated the security prosecutor for innocence. This is because to see if the work carried out by the person in charge who assists the safety inspector corresponds to the ‘uncommitted work’ to which the crime of abuse of trade refers, it is necessary to issue an individual judgment in accordance with the relevant laws . The reason Seo’s prosecutor was appointed for the Tongyeong branch was that it was a matter that the staff in charge could judge by adding various criteria, so the purpose of this was that the security prosecutor would not force him to ” not fulfilling its obligations “.
The prosecution changed the indictment with the purpose of adding a preliminary prosecution in the repatriation process for its destruction, changing the person who abused authority from a ‘person in charge of staff’ to a ‘prosecutor of rank’. Consequently, some pointed out that the prosecution maintained an unreasonable prosecution against the former prosecution. Switching to the other party to the abuse of office is beyond the permitted range of the indictment change and does not accept the judgment of the Supreme Court.
However, prosecutor Ahn Jeon was acquitted on the 29th of last month in remand court. Section 4-2 of the Seoul Central District Court Office of Criminal Affairs (Judge Ban Jeong-mo, Cha Eun-kyung and Kim Yang-seop) recognized the Supreme Court’s legal principles and sentenced them to acquittal. After sentencing, Prosecutor Ahn left the courtroom after telling reporters: “They have a lot of problems.”
Reporter Na Unchae [email protected]
[ad_2]
