[ad_1]
 |
|
| ▲ Kim Jin-ae, a member of the Open Democratic Party, is investigating during an audit of the state administration of the Supreme Court of the Legislative Judicial Council held at the National Assembly in Yeouido, Seoul, on the morning of the 7th. | |
| Ⓒ Joint coverage photo |
See related photos |
Je-won Jang, Representative : “There are a lot of judge cartels on the internet right now. For this one-celled reason, can it be called the class 82 cartel in the SNU law school? So is there a cartel for Korea-Kim In-gyeom ? Is politics capable of bottoming out in this way? “
On the afternoon of the 7th, a ‘trial poster’ appeared on the cutting board during an investigation for the State Audit Week of the Legislative and Judicial Committee of the National Assembly. The beginning of the same day was the comments of the ’82nd Degree Poster of the Law Department of Seoul National University’ that came out on the morning of the same morning, accusing former Open Democratic Party member Kim Jin-ae of the Former Korean Liberal Party (now people’s power) lawmaker Na Gyeong-won to dismiss a seizure and search warrant.
Kim Jin-ae “pointed out to be a judge” … Je-won Jang
Representative Kim told former congressman and husband of my ex-congressman Kim Jae-ho, deputy judge of the Seoul High Court, and Kim In-gyeom, 82nd student of the law department of Seoul National University, deputy head of the Department Department of Justice Court Administration: “For me, the firing rate of (the seizure and search warrant) was almost 100% C. At this time last year, former Justice Minister Cho Kook confiscated and He registered around 70 places during a month, and asked, “Isn’t it that the 82nd degree poster from the Law Department of Seoul National University unknowingly applied?”
Deputy General Kim immediately rebutted: “If you still think that the deputy chief of court administration or the head of the court is influencing the front-line trial, it is a misunderstanding.” He also added, “I am also motivated by former lawmakers, Judge Kim Jae-ho, and Justice Minister Cho Kook (82nd student at SNU Law School).”
Representative Kim said through further investigation in the afternoon, “Na Kyung-won, Kim Jae-ho, and Kim In-gyeom are members of the International Law Society. They appeared in the media and found out that they are best friends. “. “The search warrant cited) was only 10%, and the same goes for my former legislator.”
Congressman Kim Do-eup, secretary of the opposition, also raised objections. He said: “By filing Judge’s Connection, all seizure warrants such as Special Olympics Korea (SOK) were dismissed. According to reports and stories, I heard that the Seoul Central District Prosecutor’s Office was seized and searched multiple times. late. I asked for data on how many arrest warrants were requested and issued related to the former legislator. “
 |
|
| ▲ In-gyeom Kim, Deputy Director of the Court Administration Department, listens to legislators’ inquiries during a national audit of the Supreme Court Justice and Legal Affairs Committee held at the National Assembly in Yeouido, Seoul, on the afternoon of the 7th. . | |
| Ⓒ Joint coverage photo |
See related photos |
The controversy over the ‘Judge’s Cartel’, which seemed to end in this way, came back from the mouth of the Democratic Party legislator Kim Jong-min. Representative Kim noted the successive innocence of the judges involved in the Nongdan court trial, saying, “I am in a situation where the entire arrest warrant and search of the former legislator was dismissed, and Deputy Director General Kim In-gyeom was even By no means did our deputy chief call and dismiss the order. “The problem is that this is piling up, increasing mistrust in the judiciary.”
As a result, People’s Strength’s representative Je-won Jang’s voice rose. After the final order of the main investigation, Representative Jang requested a parliamentary statement and said: “These are the current judges. What is the character of the executive officer, the deputy chief and the (mentioned) titular judge?” “Doesn’t the president have to (handle the speech) seriously?”
Ho-jung Yoon, chairman of the judicial committee, responded to President Jang. President Yoon said, “I would like to apply the policy questioning story (proposed by Rep. Chang) to Justice Minister Chu Miae.”
