[ad_1]
 |
|
| ▲ Kim Young-jin, along with the senior vice chairman of the Democratic Party (right), and Kim Seong-won, the force of the people, are giving a briefing after a meeting of the ruling and opposition parties in the Assembly Hall National in Yeouido, Seoul, on the afternoon of the 28th. | |
| Ⓒ Joint coverage photo |
See related photos |
The adoption of the National Assembly resolution condemning North Korea in the case of the murder of fishing industry officials was ultimately rejected.
The arguments of the two parties about the reason for the failure are different. In addition, the Democratic Party announced on the afternoon of the 28th that “the power of the people re-presented the urgent question on October 6 and the adoption of the resolution was broken.” On the other hand, the force of the people argued that “the resolution of condemnation (of the Democratic Party) against North Korea was a bombing, so we had no choice but to ask urgent questions.
On the morning of this day, the people’s power changed the existing position from “at the same time as the North Korean condemnation resolution and urgent pending issues” to “first address the North Korean condemnation resolution and discuss the urgent outstanding issues related later. ” I am the conclusion.
Earlier, the leader of the Democratic Party, Kim Young-jin, and the leader of the National Forces, Kim Seong-won, met at 11:30 a.m. the same day in the National Assembly Hall to share the content of the North Korea’s condemnation resolution proposed by each party, they informed the representatives of both parties and then decided to adjust the resolution again. .
Democratic Party “The power of the people suddenly demands urgent questions during the content discussion”
In a question and answer after a briefing this afternoon, Democratic Party spokesman Hong Jeong-min said, “(the people’s power) changed words and suggested a question on the current issue again.” “We were in the process of discussing resolutions, etc., but suddenly (October 6) we were going to ask questions, so today’s plenary session was canceled.”
He replied: “I did not say (the reason)” to the question: “Did the people’s power again change its position, asking an urgent question on October 6?”
It appears that the coordination of the content of the North Korean condemnation resolution has not progressed substantially. Spokesman Hong said: “I heard that it was not possible to discuss in detail (about the resolution) because we only exchanged (with the power of the people) on current issues.”
Furthermore, “(the Democratic Party’s resolution against North Korea) was not confirmed in the fact that the body was burned, so the content of the resolution included more inter-Korean joint investigations and the establishment of inter-Korean liaison networks for him. “. I don’t think I liked him either. ”
Popular Power “It must contain the content of the resolution and the urgent matters that are missing”
However, during a briefing on the same day, Hyeon-jin Bae, a spokesperson for the People’s Power, argued: “It was felt that it made no sense for the public to adopt a deliberate resolution against North Korea (proposed by the Democratic Party).
He said: “(In the resolution proposed by the Democratic Party) there was no content that the body was burned, and there was no content that the victim was a Korean government official and died during public service. It was only filled with very words. voids that the National Assembly urged “. Furthermore, “I would like to hold a one-point plenary session on October 6 to ask the Prime Minister and members of the Council of State the truth about the murder and cremation of public officials. The (Resolution) must contain the content of a North Korea’s condemnation resolution meaningful that can be understood by the public. It can be, “he insisted.
Regarding the reason for the change of position, “let’s adopt the resolution first and discuss the urgent issues later,” he said, “I was willing to see the proposal (the content of the resolution) first because the Democratic Party demanded it so strongly.” “The bottom line is that I can’t accept it because I can’t understand it.”
Regarding the possibility of negotiations between the opposition parties before the Chuseok holiday, he said: “There will be frequent talks by the leadership, but it will be difficult to meet separately. We will continue to talk on the phone.” “Although the leadership has not decided, the proportional representatives are voluntarily participating in a one-man protest in front of the Blue House, and a request has come in and is being reviewed by party members from each region that they want to hold a one-man protest.”
