[ad_1]
On the 27th, the Blue House proposed a joint inter-Korean investigation into the North Korean attack on Korean officials. Two days have passed since the chairman of the North Korean State Council, Kim Jong-un, said on the 25th that he was “very sorry.” On the 28th, the main general newspapers across the country addressed the issue through headlines on the front page.
The following is the headline of the first page of the main general newspaper of the 28th.
Kyunghyang Shinmun: South “Joint Investigation” … North “Do not invade territory”
Kookmin Ilbo: North Korea “Territorial invasion: even forced …” Quick apology and positive evaluation of the government “
Dong-A Ilbo: North Korea “invades the territorial sea” in search of the south of NLL
Seoul newspaper: North Korea “do not invade the territorial sea” by force … 靑 “Let’s investigate together”
Segye Ilbo: North Korea Says To Stop Invading Territorial Waters In Joint Investigation
Chosun Ilbo: Without asking ourselves the responsibility of killing people … 靑 “Positive assessment of North Korea”
JoongAng Ilbo: “A big question mark asks Korea”
Hankyoreh: North Korea “surrenders if it finds a body” … Government requests joint investigation
Hankook Ilbo: 靑, follow-up measures are also postponing …
The Hankook Ilbo (referred to as a follow-up action is also postponing … the joint investigation of North Korea ‘requested’ North) said: “Since the request of the Blue House for the rear of North Korea and the silence of military authorities overlapped, there is little chance that North Korea will agree to a joint investigation into this incident. “It’s the middle ground.” “It wasn’t until two days after Mr. A’s death from the North Korean attack. that the military announcement and the presidential order came out, and even the follow-up measures are causing controversy over the North’s response, “he said.” Amid criticism of North and North Korea, the Blue House received an ambiguous response. Meanwhile, there is criticism that even the Ministry of National Defense is swaying. “Hankook Ilbo said:” It is difficult for North Korea to expect North Korea to be willing to discover the truth by spreading the claim that the South has invaded. North Korean territorial waters in the body search process. “
The Hankyoreh (the government’s ‘revival of inter-Korean communication lines and the search and exchange of information’) said: “There is no precedent for a joint investigation between the two Koreas regarding this kind of ‘unexpected incident’ despite that the government has not presented a ‘joint investigation’ from the beginning. The load seems to have worked, ”he said. In the case of the death of Prince Park, a tourist on Mount Geumgang in July 2008, North Korea rejected a joint investigation by the authorities of South and North Korea, and in the case of the Cheonan of March 2010, Lee Myung-bak proposed a joint investigation with the dispatch of the inspection team from the National Defense Commission to the north. I mentioned examples that the government did not accept. Hankyoreh said: “There are many observations that North Korea is unlikely to fully accept the ‘joint investigation’ due to such circumstances.” The government’s’ joint investigation ‘proposal does not indicate’ field investigation ‘and’ communication, consultation, information In light of the North’s unprecedented attitude, such as the ‘sharing’ approach, and President Kim Jong-un has brought to the fore, there is also the expectation that creating a ‘new precedent’ will not be impossible at all. “
The military authorities waged an all-out war to search for the body of Mr. A. Earlier, the North Koreans announced that they destroyed Mr. A by burning his body. When the North announced that it had burned “float”, it initiated a search operation to find Mr. A. El Chosun Ilbo (in the clarification of “the body was not burned” … the government puts 39 search boats and 6 planes ”) said:“ Inside and outside the army, it is likely that the body was scattered in the sea after being turned into ash. It is pointed out that it is not correct to wander the sea to find it. ‘ Rather, when North Korea lit a fire and claimed that Mr. A in the float disappeared, there are also doubts as to whether he is keeping up. ” An anonymous military official claimed that “the feeling that North Korea is hitting North Koreans hard is consistent with the unilateral claim that North Korea did not burn a body.” Also he said.
There are also questions about Mr. A’s actions during the day. The Seoul newspaper (“I was not wearing a life jacket, I do not know who the slippers are” … testimony of Mr. A and other sailors) said: “While Mugunghwa 10, where Mr. A was, returns to Mokpo, the investigations However, with the mixed testimony of a colleague who was on board with Mr. A about wearing a life jacket and slippers on deck, questions about Mr. A’s activities on the deck are mounting. the day, ”he said. The Ministry of National Defense and the Coast Guard said the possibility of North Korea could not be ruled out by presenting A’s slippers that remained on the ship, wearing a life jacket, complaining of pain from habitual debts and Information from the Ministry of Defense. Willing testimonies are coming out. Some argue that Mr. A was not wearing a life jacket, and there are testimonies from the crew of Mugunghwa No. 10 that they do not know who are the shoes that are Add that they are Mr. A.
The intelligence that the military authorities first obtained on Mr. A was known as information that intercepted North Korea’s communication signals. An editorial in the Seoul newspaper (people will trust and depend on powerlessness) said: “If the military, who must protect people’s lives by whatever means and method, according to the content of their own intelligence, the North Korean military they even captured the scene of Mr. A’s murder and burned the body. Still, it’s hard to convince that regardless of the protests you make, it’s hard to understand that the burden of exposing information assets is high if you use Sigint (signal information like interception) right away. However, it is about the life of our people. Information assets cannot be more important than people’s lives. He pointed out that it is difficult to accept the defense of the absence of countermeasures since a secondary or final countermeasure has not been devised ”. Furthermore, he stressed that “the military hastily designated Mr. A as a sentence for defection to North Korea is a questionable part,” and stressed that the controversy of Mr. A’s attempts to defect to North Korea should also be clarified. to investigate the facts.
North Korea “Stop trespassing, South Korea” … intentional problem? Advanced pavement?
On the other hand, there are many interpretations in the context of North Korea’s request to the South in the form of a report by the Korean Central News Agency on the 27th to “immediately stop any transfer to the military demarcation line at sea. Western, which may cause new tensions. ” The Blue House and the military authorities are not responding as much. It is interpreted with the intention of ‘I will not get involved’ in the North Korean argument.
In general, it is an interpretation that the North Korean side began to raise issues related to this incident. The Hankook Ilbo (another NLL variable … North Korea began to neutralize it) said: “It was silent about the NLL established in 1953. North Korea, which unilaterally established a maritime military border line that was advantageous to its side ago 20 years old, he played it with the intention of putting her in question again. It is done. “Kyunghyang Shinmun (” Boundary of the Western Sea “, which has arisen again)” It seems that he intends to raise the question of the maritime boundary of the Western Sea. If the North Koreans even see military movements, not only will it be difficult to discover the truth of the incident, but it will also increase the possibility of tension between the two Koreas. “
In this regard, an editorial in the Kyunghyang Shinmun (South-North, ‘West Sea Conflict’, rather than ‘West Sea Conflict’), read: “(North Korea) declared unilaterally in 1999, based on the West Sea Coast Guard ship, the old embers of the inter-Korean conflict over the West Sea NLL. “If President Kim Jong-un’s apology, saying, ‘I am sorry for my compatriots in the South,’ is sincere, we must cooperate with the South to discover the truth and recover the remains. He stressed that high-level contact between the two Koreas to discuss this issue should be done as soon as possible. “
On the other hand, the Seoul newspaper (“the weight of” preparing for the reinforcement of the recognition of the South “rather than the intention to neutralize the NLL”) said: “Instead of the intention to rekindle the problem of the North Limit (NLL) amidst an apology from President Kim Jong-un, instead of rekindling the problem of the North Limit Line (NLL) He interpreted that the weight is put on the analysis of the preliminary cobblestone for its preparation. ”Kim Yeol-soo, head of the security strategy division of the Korean Military Research Institute, told the Seoul newspaper: “The reinforcement of the South’s search and reconnaissance activities in the NLL area is likely to be anxious and intend to contain it. “” According to the reaction of the South, the problem of the NLL may be seriously posed. “
Hankook Ilbo and JoongAng Ilbo have started planning serialization under the theme of ‘fair speech’
The Hankook Ilbo started a relief interview on the topic of “talking about fairness.” The first is Kim Woo-chang, professor emeritus at Korea University. The Hankook Ilbo presented Professor Kim as “an elderly thinker who represents the intellectual society of our country.” Professor Kim answered questions about the equity controversy surrounding Cho Kook and former Justice Minister Chu Mi-ae, the transition of Incheon airport non-regular workers to regular workers, a doctors strike, and the fairness of the current government. . The Hankook Ilbo will interview a series of interviews with Lee Sang-don, Emeritus Professor of Chung-Ang University, former member of the National Assembly, Joo Jin-hyung, the senior member of the Open Democratic Party, former representative of Hanwha Investment & Securities, Jang Hye-young, a member of the Justice Party, Dong-soo Lee, a member of the Democratic Young Politicians team at the National Department of Studies at Kim University, and a member of Park Yong-jin’s Seoul Free Party . Ad.
The JoongAng Ilbo started planning the release of the theme “Big question mark, asking in Korea.” The first question mark is “Is it a sin to take sides?” Professor Kang Won-taek of Seoul National University (“Passport, I have never been so politically hostile to view the other person as a non-competitor”) and Professor Kim Ho-gi (“586, Korean Politics Gala with a democratic and anti-democratic structure “) Loaded. The JoongAng Ilbo said in the description of the planning: “Gwanghwamun and Seochodong, criticism and defense of Chumiae, old and new evil, Japanese indigenous war and pro-North Korean scandals … Democratic forces, especially since 586 took office , they faced a huge dividing line, and the two have a constant civil war. He said, “For ‘Moonpa’ and ‘Taegukki’, the other person is just an object of extinction.” “Is stream splitting a Korean phenomenon? Is it a sin to take sides? “, I ask.
Copyright © Media Today, unauthorized reproduction and redistribution are prohibited.
[ad_2]
