[ad_1]
 |
|
| ▲ Members of the Citizens Committee for Naturalization of the Four Great Rivers held a press conference in front of the Sejong Center for Cultural Affairs in Seoul on the morning of the 23rd, fearing that Sejongbo’s natural restoration plan would be withdrawn due to external pressure. from local public officials and politicians, urging confirmation of the original plan to deal with the Geum and Yeongsan rivers. | |
| Ⓒ Kwon Woo-seong |
See related photos |
The Geum River Basin Water Management Committee (hereinafter, the Geum River Basin Committee, Co-Chair, Cho Min-rae, Minister of the Environment, Sang-jin Lee, Principal Investigator, Chungnam Research Institute ) accepted the three measures proposed by the Planning Committee of the Evaluation and Study of the Four Rivers (hereinafter, the Planning Committee of the Four Rivers) of the Ministry of the Environment. Final position decided. Sejongbo is dismantled, Gongjubo conveys the views of ‘partial dismantling’ while maintaining the function of public road bridges, and Baekjebo ‘always open’ to the National Water Management Committee.
On the morning of the 25th, the Geumgang Basin Commission held a plenary meeting at a hotel in Yuseong-gu, Daejeon, and deliberated and decided opinions on how to address these three reports. When the Geumgang Basin Commission submits this opinion to the National Water Management Committee, the committee will thoroughly review the opinions of the Youngsan River Basin Commission and finalize a plan for the management of the Geumgang-Youngsan River girders around October.
At the policy subcommittee held on the 22nd before the Geumgang Basin Committee general meeting that day, Gongjubo and Baekjebo followed the proposal of the Four Great Rivers Planning Committee, but Sejongbo made a draft opinion in the direction of preserve it, obtaining the consensus of environmental civic groups. However, on this day, the main committee finally decided to ‘dismantle’ the Sejong Report as suggested by the Four Great Rivers Planning Committee.
[관련 기사]
Hong Jong-ho “Kumgang Sejong-bo’s respect for the Minister of the Environment” http://omn.kr/1p1db
Sejongbo Johnchi? “The Geumgang Basin Commission must establish its position as ‘Reinforcement decommissioning'” http://omn.kr/1p1g1
Geum River Basin Commission’s Temporary Completion ‘Sejongbo Preservation’ … Environmental Organizations “Broadway Dismantlement Movement” http://omn.kr/1p0k0
In 8 days, ‘Geumgang Sejongbo Dismantling → Jonchi Sudden Change’ … what happened http://omn.kr/1p0ro
However, in the case of Sejongbo, the timing of the decommissioning was decided taking into account the achievements and regional conditions of the ‘Geumgang Sejong City Area Natural Reclaiming Major Project’, with which five organizations, among they the Ministry of Environment, Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transportation, Sejong City, Water Resources Corporation and Korea Environment Corporation signed a trade agreement. I put in a hint clause that I decided on. The partial dismantling of Gongju-do was suggested, but considering local conditions etc., the timing of partial dissolution was decided.
 |
|
| ▲ Members of the Citizens’ Committee for Naturalization of the Four Great Rivers held a press conference in front of the Sejong Center for the Arts in Seoul on the morning of the 23rd, fearing that Sejongbo’s natural restoration plan would be withdrawn due to external pressure. from local public officials and politicians, urging confirmation of the original plan for the treatment of the Geum and Yeongsan rivers. | |
| Ⓒ Kwon Woo-seong |
See related photos |
Therefore, civic environmental groups accept that they are lucky that the Geumgang Basin Commission has followed the proposal to deal with the Four Rivers Planning Commission, but are concerned that even if the National Water Management Committee Accept this position as is, the tracks may delay large-scale decommissioning work. to have. In addition, there are voices of concern about the confusion recently shown by the Ministry of the Environment and the like.
“It is fortunate that the Geumgang Watershed Committee accepted the results of the Four Great Rivers Planning Committee while reviewing the draft produced by the policy subcommittee, but it should have taken a full position with no leads.” He noted that the survey of conscience was not disclosed and some members were excluded on the day of the meeting for reasons difficult to understand.
“It is fortunate that the Planning Committee of the 4 Great Rivers of the Ministry of Environment decided to review it as originally planned, but even if the National Water Management Committee fully accepts it,” Park Eun-young, director of the Daejeon Chungnam Green Association, pledged to take steps to dismantle Sejongbo due to the clues that ‘after the implementation of the natural recovery initiative’ It is difficult to do, ‘it worried.
Director Park added: “In the case of Gongjubo, we have been gathering local public opinion several times, but it is not understandable to give a clue to ‘consider local conditions’. Until then, I will ask for a specific time to dismantle. “
Yu Jin-soo, secretary of the Geumgang Basin Environment Council, also said: “The government’s proposal for the dismantling of the Geumgang River basin was the dismantling of Sejongbo, the partial dismantling of Gongjubo and the regular opening of Baekjebo. It is a very receptive decision that reflects the intention, “he said.” The National Water Management Committee confirmed the proposed decision of the Geum River Basin Commission on preservation treatment, and resolved the related projects and undertreatment issues. Please judge and set a standard. “
The National Water Management Committee will thoroughly review the opinions of the Geumgang Basin Water Management Committee deliberate and resolved on this day and the opinions of the Youngsan River and Seomjin River Basin Water Management Committee to be held on day 28 to determine the final treatment plan.
