[ad_1]
Citizens responded intensely to the news that the father of two children, A (47), a civil servant under the Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries, was killed at sea by North Korean troops after disappearing from a boat near Yeonpyeong Island. . In particular, the interest and anger shown by the youth in this case was great. At 6 and 7 in the afternoon of the 24th, which was work time, more than half of the articles were related to Mr. A, including the first and second place in the ranking of articles most read by adolescents and Twenty-somethings on the Naver portal site.
University students also showed anger at North Korea. Gopas, a Korean University community site, said: “He was not accidentally killed by a first soldier in a rush, and after watching for 6 hours while saying everything he had to report … How funny South Korea would look. ”, A post was published. Naver posted a comment that said, “If you don’t want to see this kind of thing again, you have to retaliate.”
There were also many questions about the government. This is what the government did during the six hours from around 3 pm on the 22nd, when Mr. A was discovered by a North Korean ship, until he was assassinated. On the community site Efem Korea, a post that read: “There was no way to contact (North Korea) for 6 hours?” It registered 27,000 visits and 100 comments in half a day. According to the Blue House, it was around 6:30 pm on that day that President Moon Jae-in received a report that a North Korean ship found Mr. A at sea. However, netizens wrote articles such as: “He is not an ordinary person, but a missing public official, but the president reported that he could not receive it once.” “President Moon should explain his six-hour actions in seconds.”
In the article that President Moon attended a government event on the 24th and saw an a cappella performance, there was a comment that said, “Even when Corona’s first death came out, we had a chapaguri party and it’s still there.” . He also said: “It is a problem to plan the end of the war and a country that can kill the people of the ROK casually.” Even after hearing the news of Mr. A’s assassination on the morning of the 23rd, President Moon announced that “(North Korea) is unacceptable” only on the afternoon of the 24th, there were taunts, such as “time difference anger” and “accumulated anger”.
In response to the announcement by the army and police raising the possibility of Mr. A voluntarily escaping North Korea, accusations were launched that read: “Do not water.” It was argued that “North Korea’s act itself of killing unarmed civilians adrift at sea and burning their bodies, regardless of whether they were North Koreans or missing persons,” was unacceptable. In particular, he was ridiculed for the disclosure by the military and police that the ‘life jacket’ or the ’20 million won debt’ as the North Korean situation. “If you pay less for the loan and wear a life jacket on the boat, you will become a potential quitter, so don’t wear it.” The expression ‘Wolbook vest’ also appeared. There was also a post that said, “Tomorrow morning, an anonymous informant will appear on Kim Eo-jun radio.” When the government first used the expression ‘makeup’, criticisms arose such as, “I remember the expressions of the victims, the preservation of the evidence and the projectiles of the Buddha statues,” “Is Empress Myeongseong also cremated?”
In response, supporters of President Kang Seong reigned over North Korea and the government. One Twitter user (ID eXw ****), who has routinely retweeted (retransmitted) the President’s Twitter post or retweeted (relayed) to his country, commented on this incident: “It must be an act in the context of the quarantine. North Korea is a country vulnerable to the crown’s response. If it spreads, hundreds of thousands of people will die. Wasn’t it a means to prevent it? “, Wrote.
On ‘Daum’, a portal with strong privacy, the comment, “Why is it the government’s responsibility to be killed by North Korean soldiers while fleeing alone?” It received more than 1,000 recommendations. On the community site ‘Pompu’, an article titled ‘Originally, if you visit North Korea, they will kill you (okay)’. The author said: “The killing of North Koreans in North Korea is not a bad measure” and “of course”.
However, this claim provoked a strong reaction. A user of SNU Life, a community at Seoul National University, said: “Is there a problem with North Koreans trying to escape North Korea? “I feel that the government is so absurd that even my judgment is blurred.” A user of the ‘blind’ from the office community said: “It is our people with or without the intention of North Korea”, and “the core is that their own citizens were killed.” Participatory solidarity, recognized as a friend of the Moon administration, also said: “The North Korean military killed unarmed civilians. It made a statement criticizing that damaging the body is an inhumane act that cannot be justified for any reason.”
