[ad_1]
[앵커]
The prosecution is belatedly accelerating the investigation of various suspicions surrounding former member of the Future Integration Party Na Gyeong-won. The police, who have been investigating some of the cases of former legislators, issued a non-prosecution opinion and turned the case over to the prosecution, but the investigation at the prosecution does not seem easy. Reporter Jo Sung-ho. The prosecution’s investigation into the allegations related to former legislator Na Gyeong-won has recently been restarted. The case handled by the Seoul Central District Prosecutor’s Office, Penal Section 1, was reassigned to Penal Section 7, and on the 18th a representative of a civic group was called and investigated who brought an accusation. Civic groups have accused me of former legislators about 10 times since last September. The allegations included the child’s entrance examination and sexual irregularities, the Special Olympics in Korea, where I was once president, the suspected privatization of SOK, and the suspected corruption of private schools at the Hongshin Academy run by my family. former member. Following the investigation of the complainant, the prosecution successively summoned public officials from the Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism as references. Earlier, the Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism announced that it had confirmed the mismanagement of business as a result of an examination by the office of SOK, an affiliated organization that supports sports and cultural arts activities for people with developmental disabilities. I pointed out that it was inappropriate for the daughter of a former legislator to act as a director without the minister’s approval. In this sense, the prosecution seems to have begun to confirm specific facts, such as capturing the results of the tests. The case of the former legislator, which was being investigated by the police, also recently passed to the prosecution. The police are known to have sent the case to prosecutors with a ‘Sir’ opinion to the effect that the prosecution is investigating the same case and there is no real interest in the investigation. Dismissal is a non-prosecution that ends the case without going to trial if there are clearly no charges or a need for an investigation. In fact, the judgment on the merits was left to the prosecution, but the prosecution’s investigation does not appear to be easy. The prosecution recently resumed the investigation and requested a seizure and search warrant in relation to SOK, but the court was reported to have dismissed it. In response, a prosecution official said he does not attach much importance to the dismissal of the order, and said he is obtaining evidence through various methods, such as voluntary submission. However, there is an analysis that it will be difficult to achieve clear results this time, as it has already been repeatedly reviewed by the Seoul Central District Prosecutor’s Office Lee Seong-yoon, classified as a pro-government proposal. As the prosecution and the reorganization of the new camp have been resolved to some extent, the cases that were left behind in the so-called cabinet, such as the case of former legislator Na Kyung-won, are expected to be unveiled one by one. YTN Sungho Jo[[email protected]]it is. ※ ‘Your report becomes news’ YTN is waiting for your valuable report.
[카카오톡] Search YTN to add a channel [전화] 02-398-8585 [메일] [email protected] [온라인 제보] www.ytn.co.kr
