[ad_1]
The Seoul Eastern District Prosecutor’s Office, which is investigating the suspicion of Judge Choo Mi-ae’s son, who has not returned to military leave, is said to be creating a “ new method of investigation, ” contrary to all practices. usual investigation by the prosecution.
◇ I didn’t ask, but tell me about the seizure and search first.
The Dongbu District Prosecutor’s Office issued a press release on the morning of 22nd and said, “Yesterday (21), the office and residence of the son of the Minister of Justice were confiscated.” It is unusual for the prosecution to first report the location of the seizure and look for a case under investigation. In fact, even in situations where reports of seizures and searches have already appeared in the media, the prosecution in most cases says: “We cannot confirm.”
On the same day, Representative Soo-jin Cho revealed the content of a public interest report that said that “Minister Chu’s son played a game at a PC cafe on the day he returned from vacation and missed his return time.” . “Not.” There was no media report saying that he had seized and searched the home of Minister Chu, who lived in Jeonju, North Jeolla Province, and of course there were no related investigations, and the prosecution personally revealed the fact that “the house was seized and searched yesterday. ” will be. In the legal world, it is a reaction that “it is out of contempt that ‘we are doing a lot of research.”
◇ After the investigation of the subpoena
It is pointed out that it is a lack of common sense what was done after calling all the people involved in the incident and investigating the seizure and search that must be carried out by surprise in the early stages of the incident in the interests of slavery.
The Dongbu District Prosecutor’s Office summoned and investigated Minister Chu’s son and his assistant military officers who had called the military officers on the 12th and 13th. Then, after a week, their residence and cell phones were confiscated and searched. A lawyer from Seocho-dong said: “If the general investigation method is to conduct a seizure and seizure search and search for the main evidence based on this, and then conduct a subpoena investigation based on this, the prosecution’s investigation of the Choo’s son is reversed. I think there is. “
In the end, he pointed to whether it was confiscated and searched to match his assortment when he was concerned by criticism that it would make sense “not to confiscate his son, but to take his son allegedly without confiscation,” before taking away Minister Chu’s son.
◇ Will the call log go out three years ago?
It was in mid-2017 that the suspicion arose that Minister Chu’s son would not return to military leave and the change of application for a job. It’s three years from now. The investigation team of the Dongbu District Prosecutor’s Office confiscated and searched the cell phones of those involved in the case, including Minister Chu’s son and military officials, only recently, eight months after the indictment. Unless you are using the same cell phone as three years ago, there is little chance that there will be evidence of significant call records. Even if you were using a cell phone three years ago, it is an observation that “the prosecution would have erased all adverse evidence in the past eight months when it crushed the investigation.” The legal community responded that “the Eastern District Prosecutor’s Office is conducting a show-style investigation to get rid of Minister Chu and his son.”
