“I was shutting my mouth” … Context of President Yoon’s mother-in-law’s countermeasures meeting ‘Cultural Archive’



[ad_1]


[앵커]

The prosecution is accelerating the investigation into the family of Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeol. Later, the Minister of Justice, Choo Mi-ae, emphasized the “investigation without sanctuary”. We are going to investigate a former associate who claims he was “ scammed into lawsuits ” by Yun’s mother-in-law. Six months have passed since the complaint was filed. JTBC obtained a recording file from 2008 containing the upbringing of Mr. Yoon’s mother-in-law.

[최○○/윤석열 검찰총장 장모 (2008년) : (정대택과 법무사를) 같이 (교도소에) 집어넣었으면, 두 놈이 짜거나 말거나 똑같은 건데. 그래서 이 XX 입 틀어막느라고…그렇게 하는 바람에…]

The attorney, who had originally made a statement in favor of Choi, reversed the statement in court that a “claim fraud” was correct. Since the lawyer held the same position after that, it appears that Choi, who was left at a disadvantage, had a countermeasure meeting with his acquaintances.

First, this is reporter Lee Sang-yeop.

[기자]

This is a 2 hour audio file recorded in 2008.

Included is the voice of Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeol’s mother-in-law, Choi Mo.

Choi seems to be angry throughout the story.

[최모 씨/윤석열 검찰총장 장모 : 재판이라는 게 판사 입만 찾아보고 앉았어. 이놈의 판사가 내가 원하는 말을 해주면 되는데 원하는 말을 안 해주고. ‘어쨌어요. 저쨌어요’ 하면 오장육부가…]

Tell the story of Baekmo, a lawyer, to his assistant.

Baek is a person who made a statement in court in 2005 that the lawsuit was scam.

At first, I made a statement in favor of Choi and then changed my testimony during the trial.

[최모 씨/윤석열 검찰총장 장모 : (우리 변호사가) 백OO이를 절대 가까이하지 말라는 거야.]

They also say harsh words about Baek.

[최모 씨/윤석열 검찰총장 장모 : 이 XX를(법무사) 무혐의로 빼놓고 나니 둘이 짜버리면 내가 곤란한 거야. (백모 법무사와 정대택을 교도소에) 같이 집어넣었으면 두 놈이 짜거나 말거나 똑같은 건데…]

There is also a situation in which money is supposed to have been handed over to convict Baek.

[최모 씨/윤석열 검찰총장 장모 : 그래서 이 XX(법무사) 입 틀어막느라고 1억5천, 5천… 그러니까 또 정대택이하고 그럴까 봐 1억 주겠다고 (약속)했거든.]

Gunhee Kim’s real name is also mentioned.

At that time, it was before I married President Yoon Suk-yeol.

Mr. Kim went with Mr. Baek, but it seems things didn’t go well.

[최모 씨/윤석열 검찰총장 장모 : 이 XX(법무사) 싹 그거 해버리더니 나중에 OO이가(윤 총장 부인) 가서 또…]

This audio file was recorded in 2008, about three years after the lawyer annulled the statement in court in 2005.

At that time, circumstances unfavorable to Mr. Choi were revealed one after another.

■ Dispute over 5.2 billion won in real estate ‘… What is the meaning of the recorded file?

[앵커]

As you may have heard, the expression ‘shut up’ appears in the recording file. The person blocking is Choi, and the target is those who claim that the ‘lawsuit fraud’ is correct.

The reporter Shin A-ram reports what this recorded file means and what has been the dispute that has lasted 17 years.

[기자]

In 2003, Ms. Choi and Ms. Dae-Taek Chung draw up an agreement.

The content was to buy the A Sports Center building bonds in Songpa-gu, Seoul, and share them when they make a profit.

Jeong gave the investment information, and Choi paid a 1 billion won down payment and bought bonds worth 10 billion won.

The revenue was KRW 5.2 billion.

However, only Choi received 5.2 billion won, and Jeong did not receive a penny.

Mr. Choi said, ‘I was forced by Mr. Jeong and wrote an agreement’ and said that he couldn’t give money.

He even sued the prosecution for duress.

At the first trial, Mr. Jeong was admitted under duress and was sentenced to one year in prison and three years of probation.

The testimony of Mr. Baek Mo, a lawyer who participated in the preparation of the agreement, influenced that Mr. Jeong had forced him.

However, at the second trial, Mr. Baek’s testimony was reversed.

At the September 2005 appeal trial, he testified that “the agreement was written with voluntary consent in my presence” and that “prior to that, I was perjured.”

However, the appeals court arrested Mr. Jeong in court and said, “The witness statement is not reliable.”

Jeong was in prison.

Paik, who changed his testimony, also turned himself in to an investigative agency in August 2008.

However, the prosecution did not put Baek on trial.

Jeong filed for a new trial in 2011, but was fired the following year.

Rather, Mr. Jeong was arrested again.

In 2017, Choi was accused of innocence and served for a year.

In the recording file of Choi’s education, obtained by JTBC, there is a situation where Choi tries to appease or appease Baek, who confessed to perjury.

The investigation to uncover the full history of the so-called ‘lawsuit fraud’ is being conducted by the Seoul 6th Central District Prosecutor’s Office.

The same department is also investigating the ‘suspected manipulation of the Duty Motors stock price’, charged by Yoon’s wife, Kim Gun-hee.

■ The “finished work” of Yoon Seok-yeol’s mother-in-law … Attention to the summons of the accuser Dae-taek Jeong

[앵커]

In response to this suspicion, Mr. Choi, Yun Suk-yeol’s mother-in-law, insists that “it’s over now.” It was concluded by the innocence and duress of Jung, who was a partner. The prosecution will summon the accuser, Chung Dae-taek, on Friday.

Next is reporter Park Jin-gyu.

[기자]

Chung Dae-taek claimed that during a lawsuit with Choi Mo in 2004, the prosecution covered up the unfavorable circumstances for Choi.

[정대택/윤석열 검찰총장 가족 고발인 : (경찰에서 최씨에 대해) 구속 의견을 올렸는데, 위증 혐의 인정되고 증거인멸 우려가 있다고. 그런데 검사가 그것을 캐비닛에 넣어 버려요.]

It began with the distribution of profits in 2003 and complaints, investigations and lawsuits have continued for 17 years.

Jeong also accused Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeol of neglect of duty.

[정대택/윤석열 검찰총장 가족 고발인 : 직접 편지도 보내고 요청서도 보내고 (윤석열 검찰총장이) 중앙지검장 됐을 때도 보내고 법무·검찰 징계위원회에 징계도 (요청)하고 해결이 안 되니까 고발을 하는 거죠.]

On the other hand, Mr. Choi argues that it is not correct to split the profits in half with Mr. Jeong.

He also claims that it is over.

It is an explanation that the situation was concluded with Chung’s innocence and coercion through the investigation of the prosecution and the court ruling.

The allegation of Deutsche Motors share price manipulation intervention has also not been disclosed whether the share price manipulation is true, but argued that the intervention could not be disputed.

(Video design: Bae Yunju)



[ad_2]