[ad_1]
Kyungnam University professor Kim Geun-sik, who first raised Naver’s suspicion of searching for ‘Chumi Love,’ said on the 21st: “Naver explained that there was an error in the counting system, but if the count was tampered with or not, when the error was corrected for alibi purposes. I still have doubts about whether I hit my back. “
Professor Kim said on Facebook that day: “If there was an error in data aggregation, it is normal for the phenomenon to appear consistently for all keywords.” This makes sense? Samcheokdongja knows that the system is not. “
Professor Kim said: “If there was a data aggregation error, the search results for mobile devices and PCs should have the same phenomenon, but why are they different?”
When Professor Kim searched for ‘Chu Mi-ae’, the Minister of Justice, on the 19th, unlike ordinary politicians, pointed out the phenomenon that ‘news’ is organized far back on the Naver menu. In the case of mobile search, ‘News’ and ‘Real Time’ are placed after ‘Shopping’, which is a long way from the menu. You can only see it by pressing it.
On the 20th, Naver explained through a blog by Sungjae Won, the senior leader in charge of search development, that “I urgently started fixing the system error and completed it around 0:50 am on the 20th.” For example, if you search for ‘Hong Gil-dong’, the click data for search terms such as ‘Hong Gil-dong’, ‘(blank) Hong Gil-dong’, and ‘Hong Gil-dong (blank)’ should be summarized, but only the data of ‘(blank) Hong Gil-dong’ It means that an aggregate error has occurred.
◇ “Suddenly a good system is just a bug in Chumiae?”
Professor Kim said: “What does it mean to be a mistake that only the click data of ‘(blank) Hong Gil-dong’ is counted. ‘It is not a mistake that’ (blank) Chu Mi-ae ‘is not counted, but the normal search term’ Chumi-ae ‘click is not counted. The possibility of manipulation is high. “
Professor Kim said, “I have to explain ‘when’, ‘how’ and ‘why’ the error occurred,” and said, “Would the point at which the error started be kept as a record in the system?” Also, “(Naver) says that there are similar cases other than Chumiae. So there must be a certain pattern in the search term for similar cases, but we have to explain it.” “The system error occurs because someone stepped in and tampered with it. He said.
Professor Kim said, “If Naver is not a detailed explanation according to the six-and-a-half principle, it is a difficult excuse.”
◇ “It is also strange when the review is complete … Make Alibi”
Professor Kim said: “The time that Naver claims the correction was completed is 0:50 on the 20th, and it is the night of the 19th when the mobile search results have returned to normal.” “Does it complete in 50 minutes?” He said, “I posted it on Facebook that it normalized on the afternoon of the 20th, so it was dawn on the 20th for an alibi.”
According to Professor Kim, it was the afternoon of the 16th that he discovered that the search category was strange. After capturing this, Professor Kim raised suspicions on Facebook around 3pm on the 19th after the issue continued for several days. When related content was posted, mobile search results returned to normal between 7 and 10 p.m. on the 19th of the same day. However, Professor Kim contends that it is unconvincing that Naver completed the bug fix at 12:50 on the 20th.
Professor Kim also said: “I doubt it is appropriate to explain politically sensitive issues through the search development manager rather than directly through the Naver manager.” People still remember what Naver did in the past. “
