[ad_1]
The National Rights Commission said the investigation into the prosecution’s suspicion of the son’s military preference for Justice Minister Chu Mi-ae and Minister Chu’s duties was unrelated. It is not a conflict of interest. Kwon Ik-Com said it was because Minister Chu did not receive any report of the case from the prosecution and never exercised command over the attorney general.
The main targets of the investigation were the son of Minister Chu and his assistants. These are people who have a private interest in Minister Chu. Furthermore, Minister Chu is also being charged. It is the subject of investigation. The duty of the attorney general is to direct and supervise the prosecution, and the prosecution is in charge of investigating the case. Therefore, the fact that Minister Chu’s position as attorney general itself becomes a conflict of interest and inevitably leads to the relevance of the position. But is not. He just says it’s absurd. Furthermore, Minister Chu exercised the minister’s power to dismiss prosecutors active in the investigation and filled the investigation team with only prosecutors dogs who followed his words. If it were normal, he would have been penalized for interfering in the investigation, not for a conflict of interest.
Kwon Ik-Com said: “If the attorney general’s wife is investigated by the prosecution during the country’s crisis in October last year, there may be labor relevance.” Although there are no differences between Cho and Cho, the attitude has completely changed after a year. Meanwhile, the only thing that has changed is that the chairman of the Kwon Ik Committee has gone from being a former law scholar to a former paratrooper for the Democratic Party. The KFTC, which protects the rights and interests of people, defends the rights and interests of the regime, and lags behind the prosecution and the Ministry of National Defense, competing for a ‘faithful dog’. It is said that not only the president, but also former aides to Minister Chu and members of the pro-government are appointed as non-permanent members and make important decisions. Isn’t it literally a conflict of interest for these people to decide on the subject of Minister Chu?
The Kwon Ik Committee reserved its judgment, saying: “We must make a comprehensive judgment” on whether or not the application ban law violates Assistant Minister Chu’s request and request. I closed my eyes. The duty officer, who denounced the suspicion that the minister’s son “did not return the military license,” said that “he cannot be seen as a public interest reporter.” The soldiers on guard are under both attack and terror by supporters of the regime. The Kwon Ik Committee, which should prevent the attack, is sending guard personnel. As the controversy grew, he even made a ridiculous excuse, saying: “The situation before the duty officers requested protection from the KWP.” The Kwon ik committee should remove even two letters of ‘national’ from his name.
