[ad_1]
Two doctors brought to trial were sentenced to fines accused of falsely drafting the death certificate of a 6-month-old baby who died from a deep stab during bone marrow extraction as a “ soldier ”, which means who died of an illness.
On the 15th, Judge Yoo Jung-woo, the only criminal 2 of the Ulsan District Court, sentenced an A (65) university hospital professor to a fine of 5 million won and a B (32) who specialized on a 3 million won fine on charges of falsely completing an infant’s death certificate. I said yes.
The accident occurred in the process of collecting bone marrow in October 2015 in a 6-month-old infant who presented symptoms of pancytopenia, in which platelets, white blood cells and red blood cells were also decreased.
Mr. B, who was a third-year doctor at the time, was having difficulty collecting bone marrow while the babies cried and cried. Consequently, C, who was specializing in the second year, took over and extracted bone marrow after several attempts.
However, after the bone marrow extraction, the baby died after showing symptoms of decreased oxygen saturation and vitality.
At the time of death, it was not possible to determine the exact cause, but through a subsequent autopsy, it was revealed through an autopsy that the baby’s artery ruptured due to a deep stab of the injection needle while C was collecting bone marrow, which caused the child to die of hypovolemic shock.
However, while drawing up the child’s death certificate, Mr. A, who was the teacher in charge, and Mr. B, the eldest, recorded the type of death as’ Soldier ‘, the direct cause of death as’ respiratory arrest ‘and the intermediate leading cause as’ Pomcytopenia’.
The prosecution said doctors had to write down the baby’s manner of death as ‘foreigner’ or ‘others and Buddha statues’, and that the manner of death (results) as ‘heart attack’ or ‘respiratory failure’ could not be record on the direct cause of death. On the basis of the fact that pancytopenia was not the direct cause of the respiratory arrest, they judged that they had drawn up false death certificates.
Mr. A and Mr. B said at trial: “The victim’s cause of death was actually due to the side effects of the sleeping pills, and he did not know it was due to bleeding due to a rupture arterial”. In this anticipated situation, there is no reason to falsely write a death certificate to conceal the cause of death. “
The judges did not accept his claim.
The judiciary said: “As doctors, the defendants were fully aware that the victim could not have died due to a chronic illness.” “In a situation where the cause of death is uncertain, the cause of death is ‘unknown’ and the type of death is ‘otherwise.’ It should have been written in greeting ‘or’ other ‘, but it was written differently from the truth. “
However, they were found not guilty of homicide charges at their work. “
