[ad_1]
“A mother before the minister” (Representative Bum-gye Park) “Must be revealed behind the soldiers on duty” (Representative Kyunghyup Kim)
On the 14th, Democratic Party lawmakers raised a ‘substantial suspicion’ against the public interest informant who raised the controversy over preferential military service, the son of Justice Minister Chu Mi-ae, posing as Minister Chu . On the other hand, while raising suspicions, he expressed his discomfort at the “state investigation” requested by the opposition party. It is observed that it was a battle of public opinion to calm the controversy of the son of Minister Chu and prevent the departure of sympathizers between 20 and 30 years old who are sensitive to the corruption of the military service.
The leader of the Democratic Party, Lee Nak-yeon, said in the Supreme Council that day: “Minister Choo Mi-ae revealed his heart and position on the issue of the son yesterday. He told me his family history and his loyalty to the reform of the prosecution, which he did not know enough about, he said: “The facts have become much clearer with the efforts of the party members.” “The truer truth will be masked by the investigation of the prosecution,” he said. “It is correct that the political power refrain from political disputes and await the results of the investigation of the prosecution. “If the opposition party continues its political offensive, we will respond and block with facts.”
This is the first time that CEO Lee, known for his prudent actions, has made a statement regarding the controversy over Minister Chu’s son. The fact that Representative Lee even went to cover for Minister Chu is interpreted to reflect a feeling of concern that if the issue is neglected, it could become a ‘second homeland situation’. According to Real Meter on the 14th, the approval ratings of the Democratic Party and President Moon Jae-in decreased 4.4% and 2.5%, respectively, from the previous week due to the controversy over the minister’s son. Chu Mi-ae.
Representative Park Beom-gye appeared on a radio broadcast that day and said, “Before being the minister and representative, a mother.” Representative Kim Nam-guk noted in a terrestrial radio broadcast that “the culture of military service has changed, for example, mothers freely communicate with the army, but it is not appropriate to take this as a problem.” On the same day, Representative Kim Gyeong-hyup recounted on Facebook, saying, “Why did the informant (the duty officer) who first raised the suspicion of preferential sick leave lied saying it was the external pressure from Captain Yuk? Bon? ” “Why did I lie about the guidance I gave to the whole family of apprentices, saying: ‘I gave 40 minutes of education to ask my private grandmother not to ask me.’ He said, “You must say who is behind it.”
Criticism over the controversy over Minister Chu’s son continues despite the Democratic Party’s massive public opinion war. The professor at Seomin Dankook University School of Medicine, who was named as the “ black book of the fatherland, ” satirizes Minister Chu’s apology to his social media service (SNS). Professor Seo, through an article that begins with “ Sorry honey, ” apologized to his wife for accidentally breaking the front door while trying to help with housework, and suddenly brought up the prosecution reform . Professor Seo said in the article, “By the way, what do you regret? I’m not sure about that either. But that is not what matters. You can fix the front door later, but you know that prosecution reform is not possible now or not, honey. Let’s make sure we complete it. The reform of the prosecution service, ”criticized Chu.
The People’s Power of Representative Kim Ung sneered at Minister Chu saying, “Si Byeon Sato said that he regretted trying to reform the prosecution, a country that had never experienced Seong Chun-hyang as a single criminal.” On the other hand, Minister Chu, for the first time since an Il controversy apologizing on his own SNS, said, “I am concerned about my son’s problems when he served in the military,” and said, “I am very sorry for the people.” .
