[ad_1]
On the issue of whether MBC will call the victim who accused the late Seoul Mayor Park Won-soon of sexual harassment as a “ victim ” in a written test for new reporters, the internal and external controversy engulfed me. It is noted that the case where the passport against Mayor Park was lifted was unusually criticized for avoiding the title of ‘victim’, and the issue that had rearranged the terminology became a controversial issue, and that it was a second offense.
Within MBC, various reporters are known to be criticizing the issue. The victim’s agent, the minority union MBC and the headquarters of the media union MBC took official positions in turn.
MBC held a rehearsal test for new MBC (career) reporters on the 13th as the thesis, “Park Won-soon, former mayor of Seoul, sparked a controversy over the name of the person who raised the issue of harassment sex after making an extreme decision. ” What word do you think is appropriate, “appellant” (complaining victim) and “victim”? Discuss the reason. ”
In the thesis passage, MBC said: “On the one hand, the truth of the case was not revealed, but if the word ‘victim’ is used, the sexual assault will become a predetermined event, and it was called ‘whistleblower victim’ or ‘whistleblower victim’. On the other hand, contrary to existing practice, they argued that the use of the word ‘affected person’ in itself contradicts the focus on victims in sexual crime cases and promotes secondary harm. It’s okay to present it. “
In addition to the Blue House, the Democratic Party and the Seoul Metropolitan Government announced their position on the charges of sexual harassment by the late Mayor Park in July, repeatedly using the title of “ the complaining victim ” or “ the whistleblower victim ” to generate controversy. The victim who sued the criminal case was called a legal victim, and the media has been using the term “victim” extensively when reporting on cases of sexual violence. MBC also wrote the title “victim” in the press release after internal discussions at the press headquarters.
That day, an article on the subject was published on the press preparers’ online community ‘Anrang’. On the bulletin board, “From the case where there is an obvious victim, it is not a certain amount of time, but is the current case taken and used as a topic? It is terrible to think that hundreds of examinees gathered in one place to write a message about whether it was the victim or the victim ”,“ The victim is an incorrect expression. Obvious secondary abuse ”“ It seems inappropriate for the theme of the essay. I wrote about why the victim was right and the complainant was wrong, as I thought, but it was not a matter to discuss, but a matter in which one of the parties was clearly wrong.
On the 14th, the victim’s representative expressed regret in an interview with KBS Radio ‘Kim Kyung-rae’s Strongest Current Issue’ with the intention of inflicting a second on MBC’s thesis. Attorney Kim Jae-ryeon (Onsesang Law Firm) said: “The people who named the victims as victims officially apologized and the terms were clarified. However, the media returned to controversy over this, “he said.” It has created a situation where 1,800 candidates put the victim who has been alive for some time on a cutting board and decide what to call this person. “Attorney Kim said,” The victim expressed this situation as very cruel.
Lawyer Kim said: “From the victim’s point of view, the victim claimed ‘I was harmed’ and filed a legal complaint. In our law, we name the victim from that stage and apply the procedural protection rules so that the victim can receive free legal aid “. “The victims of this incident are also receiving support for this type of procedure, and it is very regrettable and regrettable to ask questions with intentions and throw them as the thesis of whether it is correct to use the name of ‘complainant victim’ that is not in any other place” .
On the morning of the 15th, the MBC Press Office reportedly said that it would reflect on the position when reporters from the news bureau present their views. It is known that among reporters, the opinion that the topic is inappropriate or that it is a second offense.
MBC’s position is that there is no problem with the current topic. An MBC official said: “The issue is not seeing which case is correct, but understanding the ability to judge the context of the case. “The key is which candidate chose a specific answer on what basis,” he said. “If there is a problem with the handwriting as a victim, you can use various reasons to argue this.” The official said: “The key to journalistic skill is impartiality and objectivity. He said: “You have to make arguments and criticism after hearing several stories without predicting.”
The majority in the company and minority unions made official criticisms the same day. The MBC Labor Union, MBC’s third internal union, made a statement that day, saying: “Many candidates were upset because ‘there is concern that there is concern about secondary harm to victims on the issue itself.’ ‘The thesis is partial’ and the ‘ideological verification’ was noted, “he said.” I ask MBC President Park Seong-je to clarify who made this issue for what purpose. ”
The headquarters of MBC, a media union, also said: “It is not appropriate to question the issue as controversial in the situation that the company has already organized its position on the use of terminology, and it is regrettable that the position of the victim or the seriousness of the matter has not been fully considered. ” You need a position. We will raise the issue through the official branch ”.
Copyright © Media Today, unauthorized reproduction and redistribution are prohibited.
[ad_2]
