[ad_1]
Entry 2020.09.13 20:37
On the 11th (local time), Dr. Yan Li Meng from the University of Hong Kong University of Public Health said, “From late December last year to mid-January this year, before the crown, from late December last year to mid-January this year “, on ITV’s UK talk show. I participated, “he said.
On that day, Dr. Yan explained, “We will publish a report containing evidence to support the claim that the origin of the crown is the Wuhan Institute based on the genetic sequence, etc.” e “Even without biological knowledge, we will be able to confirm why the crown left the Chinese laboratory.” did.
The research center Dr. Yan mentioned is controlled by the Chinese government and is believed to refer to the Wuhan Virus Research Institute, which is suspected of various leaks. He added: “Since the crown does not occur naturally, the story that the Wuhan fish market is the origin is a kind of ‘smoke.’
China’s National Hygiene and Health Commission said: “As soon as an outbreak case was confirmed in Wuhan, we immediately launched an investigation to prevent the spread.” The World Health Organization (WHO) denied the origin of the research institute, citing that it repeatedly revealed that there was no evidence that the crown was made in the laboratory.
The University of Hong Kong side also said: “It is a rumor and there is no scientific basis.” “The crown has nothing to do with person-to-person transmission,” noted a professor at the University of Hong Kong.
Meanwhile, on the 8th, China declared the de facto end of the coronavirus after seven and a half months of containment in Wuhan. On this day, Chinese President Xi Jinping also showcased his achievements in the quarantine by directly praising the 19th crown taxpayers, as a thread from the Zhongnanshan Fair, at the Beijing People’s Congress.