[ad_1]
Some people even compare this issue to the politics of the homeland. This is because it is a controversy about the preferential treatment of the children of influential characters. “People who see Minister Chu’s ‘Mother Opportunity’ feel like the debut of the former Minister of the Homeland’s ‘Father Opportunity’, who destroyed the justice of education,” said Kim Jong-in, president of the Popular Forces . Legislators from the ruling party actively defend Minister Chu. It is analyzed that an attempt is being made to prevent the government and the ruling party from becoming big bad news, such as the “crisis of the homeland.”
However, among the members of the legislators who recently embarked on the defense of “Chumi-ae”, there are people who thoroughly defended the former minister Cho last year. It seems to be the resurgence of the ‘Country Guard’.
1. Seolhoon … “To prevent the prosecution reform” “They cannot go to the army.”
Last year, “Cho Guk Jung-guk”, then a member of the Seol-hun Democratic Party, said: “If even former Minister Cho is arrested, there will be national resistance. A person who is not innocent” and “The essential part is a great framework that points to Cho and prevents the reform of the prosecution. He was diagnosed. And when a demonstration was held at the university for the resignation of former minister Cho, he said: “There is only 1% of university students who attend the resignation demonstration, and there is much more public opinion against it. ”
In the controversy over Minister Chu’s son, Representative Seol said, “Chu’s son is a person who cannot go to the military (due to knee surgery), but the fact that he was the army”. He criticized a lot, saying: “I insist on a special inspection when bringing force which is not true.”
2. Kim Jong-min … “No moral issues” “No facts … fake news”
Supreme Commissioner Kim Jong-min fought opposition lawmakers at former Minister Cho Kook’s hearing last year. He said: “As a result of fact-checking, there are no legal or moral problems.” In the interview with the media this year, he said: “Within 100 copies of the black book of the fatherland, 40% of the people support the country,” and insisted that “the case of former minister Cho is an investigation to resist the reform of the prosecution service “.
Regarding the controversy over the son of Minister Chu, Congressman Kim said that “the situation continues with only suspicions and no facts” and “the opposition party must stop the political offensive on false facts.” Furthermore, he argued, “it is necessary to confirm the facts of what the aide made a call, but it is a political offensive to associate this with Minister Chu Mi-ae” and “the army’s problem of lack of vacation documents.”
He argued that Representative Shin Won-sik disclosed the transcripts of the unit’s executives, saying, “The subordinates who have been with Congressman Shin for decades have awakened people’s hearts with fake news that revealed false facts.”
3. Kim Nam-guk … “Investigation of the fatherland, irrationality” “Because there are many people who have not been in the army”
Representative Nam-guk Kim participated in the Homeland White Paper as a writer. Over the course of the 21 general elections, he challenged the pre-election of former lawmaker Geum Tae-seop with the phrase “protection of the fatherland = reform of the prosecution.” Representative Geum Jeon was a person who spoke bitterly about the country’s situation within the Democratic Party. Representative Kim said in an interview with the press at the time: “The homeland white paper is a white paper for prosecuting reform and the country’s investigation process is unusual and irrational.”
Representative Kim insisted this time: “There are many people who have not attended the army for the power of the people, so they are making an unreasonable political offensive,” and said: “It seems that the call from the assistant is true, but I do not know. can see through external pressures. ”
4. Jaejung Lee … “Indian Rain Ritual Investigation” “Suspicion Resolved”
As a spokesman for the Democratic Party, Rep. Lee Jae-jung criticized the prosecution of former minister Cho Kuk as “criticism of the rain-style deterrence investigation in India. It was a shameless and difficult outcome.” He said: “We are going to do an investigation on planting,” he argued, saying, “The current investigation eventually wants to reject the reform.”
Rep. Lee insisted on the controversy over Minister Chu’s son, “the media reports are different from the facts, and the suspicions that have already been resolved have led to a political battle.” He also said: “The opposition party’s political offensive is a way of overshadowing the purpose of the prosecution reform that people hope for.”
5. Sangho Woo … “Country according to the keyword of the anti-moon regiment” “The soldiers of KATUSA are a comfortable army”
Representative Woo Sang-ho said in an interview with the media at the time of ‘Homeland Jungkook’ last year, “Between President Moon Jae-in’s closure, liberal graduates of Seoul National University are being attacked and abused. ” He also criticized that “the Free Korea Party (current people’s power) has captured the country with the keyword of anti-moon solidarity.”
Representative Woo became controversial when he said, “KATUSA is a comfortable army” in the controversy over Minister Chu Mi-ae’s son. In an interview with the media, he said: “The KATUSA soldier himself is a comfortable army and the controversy is pointless,” he said. “Because the work environment is similar, millions of active workers are not angry.” However, after the remarks, when voices of opposition emerged mainly from the youth of KATUSA Soldiers, he said: “I deeply apologize for hurting this incident.”
[안현호 인턴기자] [ⓒ 매일경제 & mk.co.kr, 무단전재 및 재배포 금지]