[ad_1]
Mr. A, who works as a duty officer and claims to have received a report of the unreturned (extended) vacation of the Justice Minister’s son Chu Mi-ae, is completing an investigation at the Seoul Eastern District Prosecutor’s Office in the afternoon of the 9th. 2020.9.9 / News1 © News1 At the time of the military service of the son of Justice Minister Cho Mi-ae, Seo-mo, there is growing anger among the 2030 generations over the suspicion of a “ preferential vacation ”. The suspicion of preferential military service, which is considered one of the “three national evils” (entrance exam, employment, military service), is causing a large number of young people who are sensitive to injustice. However, since the prosecution is conducting a related investigation, there is also a cautious view that we should await the results.
Looking at the results of a poll conducted by Real Meter, an expert opinion polling agency on the 11th of TBS, of 1,504 voters nationwide for three days starting on the 7th, the positive assessment of the performance of the president’s state administration Moon Jae-in was 45.7%, 2.4% less than the previous week. On the contrary, the negative evaluation was 49.5%, 1.4% more than the previous week.
Notably, President Moon’s approval rating has declined among 20-somethings, men, and students. Realmeter explained that the controversy over Minister Chu’s son spread during the investigation. With this in mind, it can be interpreted that the suspicion of Minister Chu’s son had a decisive influence on young people sensitive to the issues of military service.
Regarding this suspicion, many generations in 2030 strongly expressed their view that it was unfair regardless of whether it was illegal or not. Mr. Kim (26), who was discharged as a captain of a parent unit in the army, said: “Men in their twenties see the case of Chu’s son as unfair and unfair, different from the military or vacation system. you have experienced. ” In June 2017, when he was on duty, he took the first and second sick leave (5-14, June 15-23) and regular vacation (June 24-27) without returning to the unit for 23 days. The suspicion that Seo’s extended vacation without undergoing a medical examination at a military hospital was a privilege, and that the aide intervened in the process as an assistant to the Democratic Party of Ministers and Minister Chu’s partner. This is increasing.
Some pointed out that this is the result of a sense of privilege. A 28-year-old KATUSA soldier also said: “No matter what KATUSA is like, it is unusual to think that he will request a vacation extension over the phone. (Seo) If I was unconscious or couldn’t move at that time, it would be possible, but I know it’s not such a situation. ” He said: “I have doubts that the position (restriction of influential people) was acting unconsciously and I made such an attempt.” He insisted.
Yeommo (25), a former army sergeant, also stated: “It is a situation that cannot be done, although people who have been in the army know it.” “I wonder if it was possible because he was the son of a politician who is a prominent figure.”
Part of civil society also argued that Minister Chu should resign and take responsibility only for the suspicions raised. The Executive Director of Economic Democracy 21, Kim Gyeong-ryul, raised his voice and said, “When did senior officials wait for the legal ruling when the issue of camouflage transfer and military service came up in the past?” He said, “I think Minister Chu should resign responsibly as in the past.”
Some opinions suggest that attention should be paid to the structural part of the problem of social injustice. “Procedural fairness is important, but this suspicion can be seen as a privilege,” said Kim Jong-young, a sociology professor at Kyung Hee University. “Structural injustice is more important than procedural injustice.”
He continued, “Not only this time, but also in the previous regime, there were problems with Woo Byung-woo and Choi Soon-sil. The same is true of questions of the privileges of the elite left and right, “he advised.” We need to see this question not as a political question, but as a question of monopoly social structure and pay attention. “
Yoon Sang-cheol, professor of sociology at Hanshin University, said: “This case may have been legally right or wrong, and common political criticism may have worked, and I agree with my anger.” Professor Yoon said, “The question of how to organize that anger is regrettable,” he said. “We need to find a way to converge politically.”
There is also caution about this suspicion. Kang Mo (25), a student prepared for work, said: “If the suspicion of preferential holidays is found to be true, it would be natural for them to criticize it, but since it is still being investigated by the prosecution, I think we should look at the results Of the investigation”.
Ahn Jin-geol, director of the Minseng Economic Research Institute, said: “The research agency is under investigation and based on the results, it will be possible.” “If the suspicion turns out to be true, then Minister Chu should take responsibility. It will be enough to lead faithfully ”.
(Seoul = News 1)
Copyright by dongA.com All rights reserved.
