[ad_1]
On the 9th, the power of the people turned to the Democratic Party, who raised suspicions of omission of property reports against Proportional Representative Soo-jin Cho, saying, “Who is blaming whom?” I picked it up and went out.
Earlier, Democratic Party representative Kim Yong-min stated that “Representative Jo Su-jin was reported to the Election Commission for omission of proprietary reports” and insisted on the prosecution charges against Representative Cho. Then, in the power of the people, it was said, “Many Democratic Party legislators, including Representative Heo Young and Representative Kim Jin-ae of the Opening Party, are not correct as a result of reporting on the property.
Representative Yoo Sang-beom, a member of the National Assembly Judicial Committee, said in an article posted on Facebook: “As a result of comparing the general election posts of the ruling party’s constituencies and reports of the property of the public officials, there are unpredictable changes in real estate. Members of the ruling party’s second company are reported to have informed the NEC. “
Representative Yoo said, “The targets of the report are Gangwon-do Governor Lee Gwang-jae, who served as a member of the 17th and 18th National Assemblies, a member of the 19th National Assembly, and SME President Lee Sang- jik, who served as the Uijeongbu Prosecutor’s Office, Representative Kim Hoe-jae, who served as the chair of the National Judges Delegation. It included the legislators, Representative Jin-seok Moon, who served as secretary to the governor of Chungnam Province, and Representative Heo Young, who is the current spokesperson for the ruling party after serving as head of the secretariat office. of Seoul and high-level political affairs. “In the case of the proportional representative, he said:” Representative Kim Jin-ae, who served as the 18th member of the National Assembly, and Yang Jeong-sook, former member of the Commissioner National Human Rights, were included in the report. “Representative Yoo said:” Especially, local constituencies were informed about various issues such as omission of jeonsegwon, non-reporting of real estate, non-disclosure of deposits in his own name and the non-disclosure of unlisted shares. “(By the way) is more serious in the sense that he misled the voter if he was intentionally removed and reported in publications and elections according to the ‘nomination criteria’ ”. Representative Soo-jin Cho also posted on Facebook, saying, “Especially among the constituencies (subject to reporting), included many of the constituent members who have experienced various reports of ownership by public officials through high offices. rank as members of the National Assembly and heads of agencies. “
Under the policy, Democratic Party lawmaker Lee Kwang-jae marked his property as around 1,066 million won in election postings before the April general election, but at the end of May, he reported around 2,200 million won in the report. owned by public officials, the reported amount increased by more than 1.2 billion won. . Representative Moon Jin-seok was 3.7 billion won, which was about 6.52 billion won from 2.82 billion won. Representative Kim Hoi-jae also increased his wealth by 590 million won before and after the general election, and also by Choi Gi-sang by 390 million won. Representative Heo Young also found that the reported amount increased by 530 million won. As for Representative Lee Sang-jik, the people’s power directly filed a complaint with the prosecution on charges of false information in election publications related to the previous day.
The people’s power argued that the election commission should investigate the fact that the number of reports owned by Democratic Party lawmaker Yoon Mi-hyang (proportional) decreased by 190 million won after the general election. Representative Yoo Sang-beom said, “Representative Yoon Mi-hyang excluded his father’s property registered as a candidate when reporting the property of public officials after the elections, but it is actually his property, so there may have been a problem that must be eliminated after the elections.
Among the proportional representatives of the Democratic Party, Representative Kim Hong-geol (an increase of 970 million won) and Lee Soo-jin (an increase of 630 million won) have increased their ownership reports since the general election. In addition, independent lawmaker Yang Jeong-suk, who was expelled from the Citizens’ Party, increased his fortune by 1.72 billion won, and Open Democratic Party lawmaker Kim Jin-ae also increased his property reporting. at 270 million won.
However, Congressman Kim Jin-ae of the Opening Party also raised the suspicion of omission of proprietary reports from the ruling and opposition parties via Facebook, saying, “After Jo Su-jin, Kim Hong-geol he’s very disappointed. ” Representative Heo Young, a spokesman for the Democratic Party, said in a recent comment: “Reporting fake property is not a simple fact” and “a critical issue that can lead to the loss of parliamentary offices.”
It is known that in the case of proportional representatives, both parties and opposition parties voluntarily report their ownership to each political party through a relatively simple procedure and without mandatory procedures such as providing financial information when they were candidates. In this regard, Representative Soo-jin Cho said on Facebook: “In the case of proportional representatives, the first official data with legal appeal will be the property report of public officials after the elections.” A People’s Power official said: “Still, as it was confirmed that the Electoral Commission selected a proportional representative of the opposition party to investigate, the Democratic Party should also be investigated in terms of fairness.”
The official insisted to lawmakers in the district, “It is clearly in violation of the Public Officials Elections Law, as the details of the property reports were recorded in the electoral publication before the general elections.” Representative Yoo Sang-beom said: “According to the Public Officials Election Law, the criteria for false information is election posts, and if there are other candidates and ownership details have changed since the general election, they can be punished. for false disclosure “. “This is the reason why we prepare the content of the electoral publications after discussing the elections office with the electoral committee.”
