Seolhoon ”Chu Mi-ae’s son does not have to go. Rather praise him “



[ad_1]

Furthermore, Democratic Party representative Seol Hoon said about the suspicion on Day 1 that Mr. Seo Mo, son of Justice Minister Chu Mi-ae, had preferential treatment to return to military leave, and said : “Seo can’t go to the army,” he said. Representative Kim Byeong-ju, who served as the deputy commander of the United States-ROK Combined Forces Command, said: “The battalion commander and the commander have the authority to leave the soldiers. If the procedure goes out wrong, the battalion commander must take responsibility. “

At the plenary meeting of the Defense Committee of the National Assembly, Defense Minister Chung Gyeong-du received questions from legislators from opposition parties about the suspicion that Mr. Seo received preferential treatment while in the army. Representative Shin Won-sik, a former Deputy Chief of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, raised suspicions that there were no records related to Seo’s sick leave. “I pointed out. Minister Chung said,” Some administrative procedures were not carried out accurately “and” There may be errors in administrative procedures because those things (the evidence) are not left in the documents. “

Together with the representative of the Democratic Party Seolhoon. / yunhap news

Later, the legislators of the Democratic Party began to defend the son of Cho. Representative Seol-hoon said, “Private Seo (the rank at the time of suspicion of not returning to Mr. Seo’s vacation) decided to go to the military undergoing knee surgery before going to the military, but due to her mother’s social position, “I know you’ve been in the military,” he said. “With this issue (suspicion of preferential treatment related to Mr. Seo), a new committee is formed (for the investigation), and the history is somehow an excessive political attack.

Rep. Seol continued, “Although people who cannot go to the military, the fact that they went to the military itself is not going to be rewarded.” Since Seo voluntarily went to the military, the suspicion that he received preferential treatment from the military should not be raised, but should be commended.

Representative Kim Byeong-ju, a former military commander, said, “I was a commander, but I was generous with sick leave,” and said, “It is something to consider primarily for sick patients.” He also said: “It is too much to do this as preferential treatment to give sick soldiers sick leave.”

Representative Kim also said, “The battalion commander and the (unit) commander have the authority to drop off the soldiers. If the procedure is incorrect after investigating this, the battalion commander is responsible for what is wrong with this (preferential suspicion). It is too much to investigate “.

Unified Party Representative Ha Tae-gyeong said, “If opposition lawmakers are misunderstanding (about Mr. Seo) without foundation, please share the evidence if (Seo) was originally exempted from the military due to knee disease, as Senator Seol said earlier. ” However, Democratic Party lawmaker Min Hong-cheol, chairman of the National Defense Commission, said: “Can the (government) send data on personal information immediately?” Said.

The following is the full text of the legislators’ comments.

Assemblyman Seol Hoon (Democratic Party) I understand that the issue of Secretary Choo Mi-ae’s son, Private Seo, is a well-organized matter. In short, Private Seo had an operation before going to the military. As a result of knee surgery, despite the condition that I could not go to the army, they do not let me go because of my mother’s social position, but I have to go. While I was in the military, one knee had another problem and I was in a position to have surgery. Therefore, the story of the creation of a new committee on this issue, or something, seems to be an excessive political offensive. Anyone who knows it makes no sense to say this again, really, this is a political offensive. It is not easy to understand that even if he is a person who cannot go to the army, the fact that he has gone to the army itself cannot be praised. That’s it.

Representative Kim Byeong-joo (Democratic Party) I’ll talk to the doctor. The son of Minister Choo Mi-ae is being investigated, according to the results of the investigation. What I want to talk about is helping you understand military vacations in general. In the military, in fact, when it comes to vacation, commanders are doing well according to regulations and policies. But, in fact, we have to think about sick leave. While serving as a commander in the military, I was generous with sick leave. Because it is primarily for sick patients, you have to look at that. But when we look at the patients, the soldiers like the army commander, there is something that makes it unclear and invisible. Knee joint, herniated disc, or inside, these things were not well observed due to trauma (outside), but it hurts and hurts. The military then makes decisions primarily about sick soldiers so that they can be treated on sick leave. But just because you gave sick soldiers sick leave, it’s too much to do this as preferential treatment.

And again, the licensing authority for this soldier is with the battalion commander and his commander. So if the procedure goes wrong in investigating this, the battalion commander must take responsibility, and the National Defense Commission does an investigation with this, this is too much. This is a violation of military authority. We must take that into account.

Representative Ha Tae-kyung (Integrated Party) If opposition lawmakers have an unsubstantiated misunderstanding, it was originally a military exemption due to knee disease that your esteemed congressman Seol Hoon mentioned earlier. If you share this evidence, it seems that we will not discuss unnecessary arguments. Isn’t that kind of data available from the Ministry of Defense or the Military Personnel Administration? Send it. President, point out that

Min Hong-cheol, Chairman of the National Defense Commission (Democratic Party) Well, can you directly submit your personal data? Please do not argue with the legislators, however, I know that this matter is currently being investigated by the prosecution. That is why it is impossible to predict in advance the situation where the investigation results did not come out as we said before, Representative Kim Byeong-ju. So looking at the results, I think it can be done if it seems like an issue that our Defense Committee can discuss. So, I know that the judicial commission is also interested in that part and the prosecution is also investigating it, but it is not too late to report how the investigation goes, I think so.

[ad_2]