[ad_1]
A specialist from Seoul National University Hospital is holding a one-man protest picket against the government’s health care policy, such as the expansion of the medical school grounds, at Gwanghwamun Square in Seoul on 30. 2020.8. 30 / News1 © News1On the 30th it was decided to continue the ongoing strike indefinitely, demanding opposition to the expansion of the number of doctors in the faculty. The “strong response”, such as the government’s accusation of non-compliance with the order to initiate activities, is reported to have provoked a violent reaction from doctors.
The Korean Majority Council (Daejeon Association) decided to continue the strike indefinitely after repeated discussions about the marathon from the night of the 29th until the morning of this day. The Daejeon Association said: “All doctors will continue to act as a group according to the guidelines of the Daejeon Association Emergency Response Committee.”
In last night’s vote on the continuation of the strike, the Daejeon Association was unable to conclude that of the 193 people who participated in the vote, 96 continued the strike, 49 stopped it and 48 abstained. She said that the majority of the votes were insufficient, and that morning, after arguing again, she began to vote again.
The atmosphere changed when the re-election question was changed to the content that “the Ministry of Health and Social Welfare will adopt a consultation statement in accordance with the non-confrontation committee and temporarily suspend the group’s action.” The answer to this was only 39 votes, while 134 voted against. 13 votes abstained.
The result of this Daejeon Consultation vote is interpreted to have a significant impact on the backlash against the Ministry of Health and Welfare which accuses leading doctors one after another. Even among doctors who specialize, the burden of maintaining the strike amid the expansion of Corona 19 was not small. However, it is an analysis that the government’s attitude of pressing the “ surrender of the white flag ” strengthened the engine of the strike. Professors from Sungkyunkwan University, Kyunghee University, Ulsan University, Korea University, Hanyang University, and Gachon University made a statement to protect their students, while urging the government to reconsider the origin of politics.
A specialist who is a member of the Korean Medical Association said, “Doctors have not been able to unite easily due to the strong faction of each medical school, and for this reason they have repeatedly not expressed their opinion. I think it was converted. “
“There is no expectation that the Ministry of Health and Welfare, which only sees the president, will adequately communicate the voices of the current situation to the government.” It is doubtful that they will present an arbitration proposal ”.
The Ministry of Health and Social Welfare said: “It is difficult to understand the group’s decision to continue the collective license by annulling the result of the vote that continued to promote the strike in the first round of voting. It wasn’t, it wasn’t a fair decision. “
However, as the reaction from the medical community is unprecedented, the government’s concerns about the exit strategy are expected to deepen. This is because we cannot guarantee success in quarantine without the cooperation of doctors in the crown 19 emergency.
In the immediate public opinion war, public criticism of the elder strike is somewhat dominant, but if the legislative conflict drags on, the burden on the government will inevitably increase. In particular, the theory of responsibility for pushing the policy without making a public debate and announcing it before the COVID-19 outbreak fully evolved, is gradually gaining traction.
Furthermore, the fact that the opposition party’s offensive against this is increasing is also acting as a burden on the government.
(Seoul = News 1)
Copyright by dongA.com All rights reserved.
