[ad_1]
Liberal Democrats in the Republic of Korea were liable for damages of 35 million won when they raised suspicions that their son had committed sexual assault in high school in connection with the emeritus of the first Moon Jae-in government justice candidate , Ahn Kyung-hwan, professor at Seoul National University.
The third part of the Supreme Court (Justice Lee Dong-won, Justice of the Supreme Court) ruled on the 14th that the son of Professor Ahn’s son, Ahn, was in a lawsuit against former members of the Liberal Democratic Party, including Joo Kwang-deok, a legislator.
Professor Ahn was nominated as the Prime Minister of Justice for the Moon Jae-in government in June 2017. At a press conference, lawmaker Joo Joo and others raised the suspicion that “Ahn’s son was disciplined for violence sexual during high school. ” Furthermore, because such content was not recorded in the school life record, he admitted to Seoul National University that he had been admitted to Seoul National University.
Professor Ahn replied that it was a false claim and said that “the son was subject to disciplinary action for expulsion because he was in the same room as a student at the same school and in the dorm.” Professor Ahn’s son filed a suit to claim damages of 100 million won, saying, “I made” male student sexual violence “based on false facts and undermined my reputation.”
The first and second judges judged the claims of the legislators and others to be false, and raised Ahn’s hand. The trial court said: “If the defendants had only reviewed the school records at that time, it would have been easy to see that the plaintiff had never had sexual violence.” ”
The Supreme Court also considered that the lower court’s judgment was correct. In particular, he dismissed the state legislator’s claim that “the National Assembly’s immunity privilege applies” and said: “The object of the immunity privilege is limited to ‘official comments and voting in the National Assembly, which are essential for the performance of duties’, etc. ” The Supreme Court tribunal said: “The press conferences and the statements of the accused were not related to the audit and investigation of the National Assembly, which is a unique function of the National Assembly.” It was an illegal act for the objective assessment of society to degrade the plaintiff’s personal worth by a timely adversary. “
By Choi Dong-soon, reporter [email protected]
Empathy is possible even when you’re offline
[ad_2]
